Xiao v. Garland
| XIU QIN XIAO |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 20-4207 |
| December 22, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 MOTION ORDER, denying as moot for stay of removal, FILED. [Entered: 04/26/2021 11:04:00 AM] |
| Filing 27 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 04/23/2021, determining the appeal to OIL, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 04/23/2021 12:27:00 PM] |
| Filing 26 FRAP 42(b) IMMIGRATION REMAND ORDER, remanding case to BIA, pursuant to this Court's October 16, 2012 opinion, by DC, FILED. [Entered: 04/23/2021 12:24:00 PM] |
| Filing 25 NEW CASE MANAGER, Atasha Joseph, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 04/23/2021 12:22:00 PM] |
| Filing 24 CAPTION, pursuant to FRAP 43(c)(2), AMENDED. [Entered: 04/21/2021 04:32:00 PM] |
| Filing 23 MOTION, for FRAP 42(b) immigration remand, on behalf of Petitioner Xiu Qin Xiao, FILED. [Entered: 04/21/2021 03:22:00 PM] |
| Filing 22 Jeffrey A. Rosen, Respondent, replaced by Merrick B. Garland, Respondent, per FRAP 43(c)(2), SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 3/15/2021 05:09:46 PM] |
| Filing 21 IMMIGRATION 90-DAY TOLLING ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 02/11/2021 03:47:00 PM] |
| Filing 20 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILED [Entered: 01/27/2021 01:07:00 PM] |
| Filing 19 NEW CASE MANAGER, Connie Mazariego, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 01/06/2021 01:23:54 PM] |
| Filing 18 NON OPPOSITION RESPONSE to, motion for stay of removal, on behalf of [-], FILED. [Entered: 12/29/2020 10:32:59 AM] |
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel/Additional Counsel, [7], [9], on behalf of Petitioner Xiu Qin Xiao, FILED. [Entered: 12/29/2020 09:26:50 AM] |
| Filing 15 CAPTION, pursuant to FRAP 43(c)(2), AMENDED. [Entered: 12/29/2020 09:23:57 AM] |
| Filing 14 William P. Barr, Respondent, replaced by Jeffrey A. Rosen, Respondent, per FRAP 43(c)(2), SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 12/28/2020 05:51:18 PM] |
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Xiu Qin Xiao, FILED. [Entered: 12/28/2020 04:21:05 PM] |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Jesse D. Lorenz in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 12/28/2020 03:50:57 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, FILED. [Entered: 12/28/2020 12:21:11 PM] |
| Filing 10 Motion, for stay of removal, on behalf of Petitioner Xiu Qin Xiao, FILED. [Entered: 12/28/2020 12:18:04 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, FILED. [Entered: 12/28/2020 12:15:20 PM] |
| Filing 8 FORM C/A, on behalf of Petitioner Xiu Qin Xiao, FILED. [Entered: 12/28/2020 12:09:43 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, FILED. [Entered: 12/28/2020 12:01:56 PM] |
| Filing 6 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 12/22/2020 11:42:08 AM] |
| Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Xiu Qin Xiao, USCA receipt # A02-226-ACMS FILED. [Entered: 12/22/2020 11:37:23 AM] |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Xiu Qin Xiao, received on 12/21/2020, OPENED. [Entered: 12/22/2020 11:35:48 AM] |
| Filing 3 OIL for Respondent William P. Barr, ADDED. [Entered: 12/22/2020 11:30:26 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 12/4/2020 12:00:00 AM, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/21/2020 02:52:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Xiu Qin Xiao, FILED. [Entered: 12/21/2020 02:52:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
