Washington v. Dewey
| Sgt. #244 F. McGreough, Detective, #310 D. Ortiz, East Hartford Police Department, Honorable Julia Dewey and David Zagaja, Prosecutor |
| Detective, #314 Frank Napolitano and Francis Joseph McGeough |
| Laurence Washington |
| 20-455 |
| February 4, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, John Doroghazi for Laurence Washington, in case 20-455 , [ # 8 ], ADDED.[2771899] [20-455] [Entered: 02/06/2020 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Laurence Washington, FILED. Service date 02/06/2020 by CM/ECF. [2771893] [20-455] [Entered: 02/06/2020 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Tadhg Dooley for Laurence Washington, in case 20-455 , [ # 6 ], ADDED.[2771864] [20-455] [Entered: 02/06/2020 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Laurence Washington, FILED. Service date 02/06/2020 by CM/ECF. [2771787] [20-455] [Entered: 02/06/2020 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Francis Joseph McGeough and Frank Napolitano, district court receipt # ACTDC-5674659, FILED.[2770956] [20-455] [Entered: 02/05/2020 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 01/10/2020, RECEIVED.[2770954] [20-455] [Entered: 02/05/2020 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Francis Joseph McGeough and Frank Napolitano, FILED. [2770942] [20-455] [Entered: 02/05/2020 03:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
