United States of America v. Paulino
| Jose Burgos Cabada, AKA Cabeza, AKA McQueen, Dionicio Severino-Tejada, AKA Jorge, Francisco Paulino, AKA Grifo, AKA Rubio, Victor Dejesus-Ferreira, AKA Grande, Mario Pulido-Lopez, Victor Ferreira-Rosario and Rauly Rojas-Paulino |
| Rafael Paulino, AKA Calvo, AKA Nono |
| United States of America |
| 20-465 |
| February 7, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION, to be relieved as attorney, on behalf of Appellant Rafael Paulino, FILED. Service date 02/10/2020 by US mail.[2775108] [20-465] [Entered: 02/11/2020 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Frank Balsamello for United States of America, in case 20-465, [ # 6 ], ADDED.[2774090] [20-465] [Entered: 02/10/2020 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 02/10/2020 by CM/ECF. [2774072] [20-465] [Entered: 02/10/2020 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Calvin David Garber, Esq. for Appellant Rafael Paulino, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[2772525] [20-465] [Entered: 02/07/2020 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2772520] [20-465] [Entered: 02/07/2020 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 01/30/2020, RECEIVED.[2772519] [20-465] [Entered: 02/07/2020 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Rafael Paulino, FILED. [2772516] [20-465] [Entered: 02/07/2020 09:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
