Kampfer v. Argotsinger
Thomas Ruliffson, Town of Mayfield, Town Councilman, Richard Argotsinger, Town of Mayfield, Town Supervisor and Board Member, Vincent Coletti, Town of Mayfield, Town Councilman, Jack Putman, Town of Mayfield, Town Councilman and Steven Van Allen, Town of Mayfield, Town Councilman |
Douglas E. Kampfer |
20-784 |
March 4, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Douglas E. Kampfer Brief due date as 06/05/2020. Joint Appendix due date as 06/05/2020, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2803330] [20-784] [Entered: 03/17/2020 10:32 AM] |
Filing 22 ATTORNEY, Corey A. Ruggiero for Thomas Ruliffson Jack Putman Richard Argotsinger Steven Van Allen Vincent Coletti, in case 20-784 , [ # 19 ], ADDED.[2803136] [20-784] [Entered: 03/17/2020 08:50 AM] |
Filing 21 ATTORNEY, Gregg T. Johnson, [ # 18 ], in place of attorney April Laws, SUBSTITUTED.[2803129] [20-784] [Entered: 03/17/2020 08:48 AM] |
Filing 20 NEW CASE MANAGER Jasmine Beard, copy to pro se appellant, ASSIGNED.[2803121] [20-784] [Entered: 03/17/2020 08:37 AM] |
Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Richard Argotsinger, Vincent Coletti, Jack Putman, Thomas Ruliffson, Steven Van Allen and Appellant Douglas E. Kampfer, FILED. Service date 03/16/2020 by US mail. [2802940] [20-784] [Entered: 03/16/2020 05:55 PM] |
Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Richard Argotsinger, Vincent Coletti, Jack Putman, Thomas Ruliffson, Steven Van Allen and Appellant Douglas E. Kampfer, FILED. Service date 03/16/2020 by US mail. [2802937] [20-784] [Entered: 03/16/2020 05:52 PM] |
Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, for Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance o/b/o April J. Laws, Esq., on behalf of Appellee Richard Argotsinger, Vincent Coletti, Jack Putman, Thomas Ruliffson and Steven Van Allen, FILED. Service date 03/16/2020 by US mail.[2802931] [20-784] [Entered: 03/16/2020 05:49 PM] |
Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Richard Argotsinger, Vincent Coletti, Jack Putman, Thomas Ruliffson and Steven Van Allen, FILED. Service date 03/16/2020 by US mail.[2802928] [20-784] [Entered: 03/16/2020 05:48 PM] |
Filing 12 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Douglas E. Kampfer, informing Court of proposed due date 06/05/2020, RECEIVED. Service date 03/09/2020 by US mail.[2800126] [20-784] [Entered: 03/12/2020 12:48 PM] |
Filing 11 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Douglas E. Kampfer, FILED. Service date 03/09/2020 by US mail.[2800125] [20-784] [Entered: 03/12/2020 12:47 PM] |
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Douglas E. Kampfer, FILED. Service date 03/09/2020 by US mail.[2800122] [20-784] [Entered: 03/12/2020 12:46 PM] |
Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2793320] [20-784] [Entered: 03/04/2020 03:02 PM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2793313] [20-784] [Entered: 03/04/2020 03:00 PM] |
Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Douglas E. Kampfer, district court receipt # ALB011704, FILED.[2793302] [20-784] [Entered: 03/04/2020 02:59 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 02/25/2020, RECEIVED.[2793301] [20-784] [Entered: 03/04/2020 02:59 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER, dated 02/25/2020, RECEIVED.[2793298] [20-784] [Entered: 03/04/2020 02:58 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Douglas E. Kampfer, FILED. [2793286] [20-784] [Entered: 03/04/2020 02:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.