Mees v. City of New York
| Nitin Savur, Samantha Schott, Jeanine Launay, City of New York, Manhattan District Attorney Office and Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. |
| Heleen Mees |
| 21-1020 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Doctor Heleen Mees, informing Court of proposed due date 07/25/2021, RECEIVED. Service date 05/25/2021 by CM/ECF.[3107188] [21-1020] [Entered: 05/25/2021 05:45 AM] |
| Filing 19 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, [ # 17 ], [ # 18 ], on behalf of Appellant Doctor Heleen Mees, FILED.[3102932] [21-1020] [Entered: 05/18/2021 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Doctor Heleen Mees, FILED. Service date 05/18/2021 by CM/ECF. [3102925] [21-1020] [Entered: 05/18/2021 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to waive requirement, to proceed in forma pauperis, [16],[16], on behalf of Appellant Doctor Heleen Mees, FILED.[3102774] [21-1020] [Entered: 05/18/2021 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION, to waive a requirement, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Doctor Heleen Mees, FILED. Service date 05/17/2021 by CM/ECF. [3102241] [21-1020] [Entered: 05/17/2021 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Jeanine Launay, Manhattan District Attorney Office, Nitin Savur, Samantha Schott and Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., FILED. Service date 05/11/2021 by CM/ECF, email.[3097707] [21-1020] [Entered: 05/11/2021 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE, to Appellee City of New York, Jeanine Launay, Manhattan District Attorney Office, Nitin Savur, Samantha Schott and Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3096909] [21-1020] [Entered: 05/10/2021 11:22 AM] |
Filing 13
ORDER, dated 05/10/2021, dismissing appeal by 05/24/2021 unless Appellant Heleen Mees submits fee or moves in forma pauperis, FILED.[3096890] [21-1020] [Entered: 05/10/2021 11:16 AM]
|
| Filing 12 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM D-P, [ # 6 ], [ # 11 ], on behalf of Appellant Doctor Heleen Mees, FILED.[3095836] [21-1020] [Entered: 05/07/2021 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 11 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Doctor Heleen Mees, FILED. Service date 05/06/2021 by CM/ECF, email.[3095415] [21-1020] [Entered: 05/06/2021 05:21 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Doctor Heleen Mees, FILED. Service date 05/06/2021 by CM/ECF, email.[3095412] [21-1020] [Entered: 05/06/2021 05:19 PM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Claibourne Henry, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney James E. Johnson, SUBSTITUTED.[3094049] [21-1020] [Entered: 05/05/2021 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee City of New York, FILED. Service date 05/05/2021 by US mail. [3094037] [21-1020] [Entered: 05/05/2021 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 6 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D, [5], on behalf of Appellant Doctor Heleen Mees, FILED.[3089389] [21-1020] [Entered: 04/29/2021 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 5 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Doctor Heleen Mees, FILED. Service date 04/29/2021 by CM/ECF.[3089148] [21-1020] [Entered: 04/29/2021 05:18 AM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3084978] [21-1020] [Entered: 04/23/2021 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3084970] [21-1020] [Entered: 04/23/2021 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/26/2021, RECEIVED.[3084968] [21-1020] [Entered: 04/23/2021 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Doctor Heleen Mees, FILED. [3084954] [21-1020] [Entered: 04/23/2021 12:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
