Quintanilla-Mejia v. Rosen
| Ricardo Quintanilla-Mejia |
| Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting Attorney General, Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, Buffalo Field Office, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Jeffrey Searls, Facility Acting Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility |
| 21-11 |
| January 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, [25], on behalf of Appellee Ricardo Quintanilla-Mejia, copy to pro se appellee, FILED.[3041871] [21-11] [Entered: 02/23/2021 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 25 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellee Ricardo Quintanilla-Mejia, informing Court of proposed due date 04/15/2021, RECEIVED. Service date 02/16/2021 by US mail.[3041853] [21-11] [Entered: 02/23/2021 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION, for assignment of pro bono counsel, on behalf of Appellee Ricardo Quintanilla-Mejia, FILED. Service date 02/15/2021 by US mail.[3040743] [21-11] [Entered: 02/22/2021 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 19 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Thomas Feeley, Jeffrey A. Rosen and Jeffrey Searls Brief due date as 04/15/2021. Joint Appendix due date as 04/15/2021, copy to pro se appellee, FILED.[3032227] [21-11] [Entered: 02/08/2021 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 17 NEW CASE MANAGER, Karen Scarangella, ASSIGNED.[3032210] [21-11] [Entered: 02/08/2021 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, [12], on behalf of Appellee Ricardo Quintanilla-Mejia, copy to pro se appellee, FILED.[3029824] [21-11] [Entered: 02/04/2021 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 12 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellee Ricardo Quintanilla-Mejia, informing Court of proposed due date 03/22/2021, RECEIVED. No Service.[3029817] [21-11] [Entered: 02/04/2021 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 11 PAPERS, Motion for in forma pauperis, Form 7 and Form D-P, RECEIVED.[3029815] [21-11] [Entered: 02/04/2021 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Ricardo Quintanilla-Mejia, FILED. Service date 01/20/2021 by US mail.[3029809] [21-11] [Entered: 02/04/2021 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 9 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Thomas Feeley, Jeffrey A. Rosen and Jeffrey Searls, informing Court of proposed due date 04/15/2021, RECEIVED. Service date 01/25/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3019934] [21-11] [Entered: 01/25/2021 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Thomas Feeley, Jeffrey A. Rosen and Jeffrey Searls, FILED. Service date 01/14/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3013633] [21-11] [Entered: 01/14/2021 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 7 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Jeffrey A. Rosen, Thomas Feeley and Jeffrey Searls, FILED. Service date 01/14/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3013629] [21-11] [Entered: 01/14/2021 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Thomas Feeley, Jeffrey A. Rosen and Jeffrey Searls, FILED. Service date 01/12/2021 by US mail.[3011639] [21-11] [Entered: 01/12/2021 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3007966] [21-11] [Entered: 01/07/2021 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3007963] [21-11] [Entered: 01/07/2021 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 11/03/2020, RECEIVED.[3007954] [21-11] [Entered: 01/07/2021 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Thomas Feeley, Jeffrey A. Rosen and Jeffrey Searls, FILED. [3007946] [21-11] [Entered: 01/07/2021 09:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
