United States of America v. McFadden (Dudley)
| Allah Brown, Shawnn McFadden, Un, Clifford Hawkins, Daniel Thompson, Shaquana Basnight, Daniel Osborne, Roshon Cooke, Ra and Ahmad Jamal Germany |
| United States of America |
| Byron Dudley |
| 21-1437 |
| June 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 06/11/2021 by CM/ECF.[3118594] [21-1437] [Entered: 06/11/2021 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY, Meredith A. Arfa, [ # 4 ], in place of attorney Charles P. Kelly, SUBSTITUTED.[3118589] [21-1437] [Entered: 06/11/2021 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY, Charles P. Kelly, [ # 3 ], in place of attorney David C. James, SUBSTITUTED.[3118586] [21-1437] [Entered: 06/11/2021 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 06/11/2021 by CM/ECF. [3118468] [21-1437] [Entered: 06/11/2021 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 06/11/2021 by CM/ECF. [3118204] [21-1437] [Entered: 06/11/2021 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 05/14/2021, RECEIVED.[3116397] [21-1437] [Entered: 06/09/2021 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Byron Dudley, FILED. [3116394] [21-1437] [Entered: 06/09/2021 08:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
