Kofinas v. Fifty-Five Corporation
| George D. Kofinas and Maria P. Kofinas |
| Fifty-Five Corporation, Peter N. Greenwald, Rudd Realty Management Corp., Frederick J. Rudd, Jane Majeski, Paul J. Mode, "PJ", Stephen Farinelli, Dr. Ronald Blum, David Hendin, Marc Lasry, Robin Baum, Stewart Lipson, Sean Gallagher, Meredith Segal, David Cudaback, Paula Dagen, Lauren Helm, Paula Wardynski, Jeffrey Levy and John Santoleri |
| 21-1899 |
| August 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 ATTORNEY, Anthony F. Destefano, [ # 28 ], in place of attorney Caryn L. Lilling, SUBSTITUTED.[3174327] [21-1899] [Entered: 09/15/2021 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 28 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Robin Baum, Ronald Blum, David Cudaback, Paula Dagen, Stephen Farinelli, Fifty-Five Corporation, Sean Gallagher, Peter N. Greenwald, Lauren Helm, David Hendin, Marc Lasry, Jeffrey Levy, Stewart Lipson, Jane Majeski, Paul J. Mode, Rudd Realty Management Corp., Frederick J. Rudd, John Santoleri, Meredith Segal and Paula Wardynski, FILED. Service date 09/15/2021 by CM/ECF. [3174223] [21-1899] [Entered: 09/15/2021 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 27 CAMP ORDER (v), Type of Conference: Amended Telephonic, Scheduled Date of Conference: 09/28/2021, Start Time: 1:00 PM, Required Attendees: Clients with Counsel, with Mediator: Gary Shaffer, ENTERED.[3171877] [21-1899] [Entered: 09/10/2021 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 26 CAMP ORDER (v), Type of Conference: Telephonic, Scheduled Date of Conference: 09/14/2021, Start Time: 10:00 AM, Required Attendees: Clients with Counsel, with Mediator: Gary Shaffer, ENTERED.[3160011] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/20/2021 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 25 ATTORNEY, Caryn L. Lilling for Ronald Blum Marc Lasry Fifty-Five Corporation Stephen Farinelli Robin Baum Paula Wardynski Sean Gallagher Jeffrey Levy Frederick J. Rudd John Santoleri Meredith Segal David Cudaback Jane Majeski Paul J. Mode Lauren Helm Paula Dagen Stewart Lipson David Hendin Peter N. Greenwald Rudd Realty Management Corp., in case 21-1899, [ # 24 ], ADDED.[3158723] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/19/2021 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Robin Baum, Ronald Blum, David Cudaback, Paula Dagen, Stephen Farinelli, Fifty-Five Corporation, Sean Gallagher, Peter N. Greenwald, Lauren Helm, David Hendin, Marc Lasry, Jeffrey Levy, Stewart Lipson, Jane Majeski, Paul J. Mode, Rudd Realty Management Corp., Frederick J. Rudd, John Santoleri, Meredith Segal and Paula Wardynski, FILED. Service date 08/18/2021 by CM/ECF. [3158471] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/18/2021 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 23 NOTICE, to Appellees Robin Baum, Ronald Blum, David Cudaback, Paula Dagen, Stephen Farinelli, Fifty-Five Corporation, Sean Gallagher, Peter N. Greenwald, Lauren Helm, David Hendin, Marc Lasry, Jeffrey Levy, Stewart Lipson, Jane Majeski, Paul J. Mode, Frederick J. Rudd, Rudd Realty Management Corp., John Santoleri, Meredith Segal and Paula Wardynski , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3157843] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/17/2021 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 22 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellants George D. Kofinas and Maria P. Kofinas Brief due date as 11/01/2021. Joint Appendix due date as 11/01/2021, FILED.[3157835] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/17/2021 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 21 NEW CASE MANAGER, Wilson Dudley, ASSIGNED.[3157818] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/17/2021 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY, Samantha Jill Katze for Appellant George D. Kofinas and Maria P. Kofinas, in case 21-1899, [ # 11 ], ADDED.[3156864] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/16/2021 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 14 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant George D. Kofinas and Maria P. Kofinas, informing Court of proposed due date 11/01/2021, RECEIVED. Service date 08/16/2021 by CM/ECF.[3156807] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/16/2021 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 13 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant George D. Kofinas and Maria P. Kofinas, FILED. Service date 08/16/2021 by CM/ECF.[3156805] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/16/2021 12:33 PM] |
| Filing 12 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant George D. Kofinas and Maria P. Kofinas, FILED. Service date 08/16/2021 by CM/ECF.[3156804] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/16/2021 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant George D. Kofinas and Maria P. Kofinas, FILED. Service date 08/16/2021 by CM/ECF. [3156799] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/16/2021 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant George D. Kofinas and Maria P. Kofinas, FILED. Service date 08/16/2021 by CM/ECF.[3156784] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/16/2021 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3149049] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/02/2021 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3149041] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/02/2021 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant George D. Kofinas and Maria P. Kofinas, district court receipt # ANYSDC-24874871, FILED.[3149039] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/02/2021 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 07/27/2021, RECEIVED.[3149037] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/02/2021 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT, dated 07/27/2021, RECEIVED.[3149034] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/02/2021 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant George D. Kofinas and Maria P. Kofinas, FILED. [3149026] [21-1899] [Entered: 08/02/2021 04:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
