Li v. Dillon
| Feng Li |
| Mark C. Dillon, Betsy Barron, Paul Wooten, in their official capcity as justices of the New York Supreme Court, the New York State Supreme Court, The New York State Supreme Court and Sylvia A. Hinstradix |
| 21-1997 |
| August 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Feng Li Brief due date as 12/03/2021. Joint Appendix due date as 12/03/2021, copy to prose, FILED.[3181173] [21-1997]--[Edited 09/27/2021 by BM] [Entered: 09/27/2021 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 27 NOTICE, to Appellee Betsy Barron, Mark C. Dillon, Sylvia A. Hinstradix, The New York State Supreme Court and Paul Wooten , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3178329] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/22/2021 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 25 NEW CASE MANAGER, Brenda Mojica, copy to pro se, ASSIGNED.[3178321] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/22/2021 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 19 CURED DEFECTIVE LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, [ # 13 ], [ # 16 ], on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, FILED.[3169449] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/08/2021 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 18 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM D-P, [ # 12 ], [ # 15 ], on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, FILED.[3169445] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/08/2021 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 17 CURED DEFECTIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, [ # 11 ], [8], on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, FILED.[3169443] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/08/2021 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 16 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, informing Court of proposed due date 12/03/2021, RECEIVED. Service date 09/08/2021 by CM/ECF.[3169322] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/08/2021 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 15 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, FILED. Service date 09/08/2021 by CM/ECF.[3169316] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/08/2021 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, FILED. Service date 09/08/2021 by CM/ECF.[3169314] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/08/2021 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, LR 31.2 Scheduling Notification, [10], on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, FILED.[3168335] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/07/2021 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [9], on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, FILED.[3168292] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/07/2021 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [8], on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, FILED.[3168287] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/07/2021 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 10 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, informing Court of proposed due date 12/03/2021, RECEIVED. Service date 09/02/2021 by CM/ECF.[3167131] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/02/2021 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 9 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, FILED. Service date 09/02/2021 by CM/ECF.[3167126] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/02/2021 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, FILED. Service date 09/02/2021 by CM/ECF.[3167123] [21-1997] [Entered: 09/02/2021 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3157380] [21-1997] [Entered: 08/17/2021 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3157373] [21-1997] [Entered: 08/17/2021 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, district court receipt # 465401284495, FILED.[3157370] [21-1997] [Entered: 08/17/2021 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL, dated 07/23/2021, RECEIVED.[3157368] [21-1997] [Entered: 08/17/2021 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Feng Li, FILED. [3157364] [21-1997] [Entered: 08/17/2021 10:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
