Washington v. Noeth
| Jarelle Washington |
| Joseph Noeth, Superintendent Attica C.F. |
| 21-2039 |
| August 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Jarelle Washington, FILED. Service date 09/21/2021 by CM/ECF. [3177789] [21-2039] [Entered: 09/21/2021 06:00 PM] |
| Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Jarelle Washington, FILED. Service date 09/21/2021 by CM/ECF.[3177788] [21-2039] [Entered: 09/21/2021 05:58 PM] |
| Filing 15 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Jarelle Washington motion for certificate of appealability, [4], Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance [5] from the docket, FILED.[3177002] [21-2039] [Entered: 09/21/2021 05:56 AM] |
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3164624] [21-2039] [Entered: 08/30/2021 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF DUPLICATE APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jarelle Washington, FILED. [3164621] [21-2039] [Entered: 08/30/2021 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Marie John-Drigo, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[3163818] [21-2039] [Entered: 08/27/2021 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Joseph Noeth, FILED. Service date 08/27/2021 by CM/ECF. [3163803] [21-2039] [Entered: 08/27/2021 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 7 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, [5], on behalf of Appellant Jarelle Washington, FILED.[3162918] [21-2039] [Entered: 08/26/2021 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 6 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION, for certificate of appealability, [4], on behalf of Appellant Jarelle Washington, FILED.[3162903] [21-2039] [Entered: 08/26/2021 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Jarelle Washington, FILED. Service date 08/26/2021 by CM/ECF.[3162494] [21-2039] [Entered: 08/26/2021 06:40 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Jarelle Washington, FILED. Service date 08/25/2021 by CM/ECF. [3162456] [21-2039] [Entered: 08/25/2021 05:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3161221] [21-2039] [Entered: 08/24/2021 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, dated 07/27/2021, denying certificate of appealability, RECEIVED.[3161219] [21-2039] [Entered: 08/24/2021 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jarelle Washington, FILED. [3161201] [21-2039] [Entered: 08/24/2021 11:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Washington v. Noeth | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Jarelle Washington | |
| Represented By: | Randall Douglas Unger Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Joseph Noeth, Superintendent Attica C.F. | |
| Represented By: | Barbara D. Underwood |
| Represented By: | Marie Eleanor John-Drigo Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
