Rossbach v. Montefiore Medical Center
| Andrea Rossbach |
| Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC and Daniel Altaras |
| Montefiore Medical Center, Norman Morales and Patricia Veintimilla |
| 21-2084 |
| August 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Rossbach et al. v. Montefiore Medical Center et al.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3206184] [21-2084] [Entered: 11/05/2021 08:36 AM] |
| Filing 26 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/22/2021, RECEIVED.[3206179] [21-2084] [Entered: 11/05/2021 08:33 AM] |
| Filing 25 DISTRICT COURT OPINION, dated 10/22/2021, RECEIVED.[3206178] [21-2084] [Entered: 11/05/2021 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 24 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL, with copy of district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Altaras, Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC and Andrea Rossbach, FILED.[3206176] [21-2084] [Entered: 11/05/2021 08:29 AM] |
| Filing 23 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Daniel Altaras, Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC and Andrea Rossbach Brief due date as 12/09/2021. Joint Appendix due date as 12/09/2021, FILED.[3181054] [21-2084] [Entered: 09/27/2021 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 22 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Altaras, Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC and Andrea Rossbach, informing Court of proposed due date 12/09/2021, RECEIVED. Service date 09/23/2021 by CM/ECF.[3179450] [21-2084] [Entered: 09/23/2021 06:14 PM] |
| Filing 20 NEW CASE MANAGER, Wilson Dudley, ASSIGNED.[3179120] [21-2084] [Entered: 09/23/2021 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Montefiore Medical Center, Norman Morales and Patricia Veintimilla, FILED. Service date 09/10/2021 by CM/ECF.[3171684] [21-2084] [Entered: 09/10/2021 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 12 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Altaras, Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC and Andrea Rossbach, FILED. Service date 09/09/2021 by CM/ECF.[3171079] [21-2084] [Entered: 09/09/2021 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 11 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Altaras, Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC and Andrea Rossbach, FILED. Service date 09/09/2021 by CM/ECF.[3171070] [21-2084] [Entered: 09/09/2021 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Altaras, Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC and Andrea Rossbach, FILED. Service date 09/09/2021 by CM/ECF.[3171063] [21-2084] [Entered: 09/09/2021 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 6 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Daniel J. Altaras, Esq. for Appellant Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC, Daniel Altaras and Andrea Rossbach and Jean L. Schmidt, Esq. for Appellee Montefiore Medical Center, Norman Morales and Patricia Veintimilla, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3163635] [21-2084] [Entered: 08/27/2021 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3163619] [21-2084] [Entered: 08/27/2021 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Altaras, Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC and Andrea Rossbach, district court receipt # ANYSDC-24983156, FILED.[3163616] [21-2084] [Entered: 08/27/2021 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 08/05/2021, RECEIVED.[3163614] [21-2084] [Entered: 08/27/2021 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Altaras, Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC and Andrea Rossbach, FILED. [3163611] [21-2084] [Entered: 08/27/2021 10:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
