Biton v. City of New York
Police Officers John/Jane Does 1-10, Avaril, 66th Precinct, in his/her individual and official capacities and Lieutenant Simms, 66th Precinct, in his/her individual and official capacities |
Sergeant Ian Nadel, 66th Precinct, in his individual and official capacities, Latisha Wright, 66th Precinct, in her individual and official capacities and City of New York |
Iris Biton |
21-23 |
January 5, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Iris Biton Brief due date as 05/10/2021. Joint Appendix due date as 05/10/2021, FILED.[3038507] [21-23] [Entered: 02/18/2021 09:39 AM] |
Filing 27 LETTER, on behalf of Appellant Iris Biton, informing Court that she will not be ordering transcripts, RECEIVED. Service date 02/17/2021 by CM/ECF.[3038275] [21-23] [Entered: 02/17/2021 04:48 PM] |
Filing 25 NEW CASE MANAGER, Dana Ellwood, ASSIGNED.[3035339] [21-23] [Entered: 02/12/2021 09:29 AM] |
Filing 22 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, for Pro Se Scheduling Notification, Acknowledgement and Notice of Appearance, Form D-P, Certificate of Service, on behalf of Appellant Iris Biton, FILED. Service date 02/09/2021 by US mail.[3032976] [21-23] [Entered: 02/09/2021 02:09 PM] |
Filing 21 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Iris Biton, informing Court of proposed due date 05/10/2021, RECEIVED. Service date 02/09/2021 by US mail.[3032946] [21-23] [Entered: 02/09/2021 01:47 PM] |
Filing 20 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Iris Biton, FILED. Service date 02/09/2021 by US mail.[3032942] [21-23] [Entered: 02/09/2021 01:42 PM] |
Filing 19 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Iris Biton, FILED. Service date 02/09/2021 by US mail.[3032922] [21-23] [Entered: 02/09/2021 01:22 PM] |
Filing 18 ORDER, dated 01/26/2021, dismissing appeal by 02/09/2021, unless Appellant Iris Biton, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3021450] [21-23] [Entered: 01/26/2021 04:23 PM] |
Filing 17 ORDER, dated 01/26/2021, dismissing appeal by 02/09/2021, unless Appellant Iris Biton, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3021439] [21-23] [Entered: 01/26/2021 04:17 PM] |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY, Elizabeth I. Freedman, [ # 15 ], in place of attorney James Edward Johnson, SUBSTITUTED.[3020810] [21-23] [Entered: 01/26/2021 10:03 AM] |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee City of New York, Ian Nadel and Latisha Wright, FILED. Service date 01/22/2021 by US mail. [3018899] [21-23] [Entered: 01/22/2021 01:51 PM] |
Filing 12 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3011700] [21-23] [Entered: 01/12/2021 02:36 PM] |
Filing 11 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dated 01/06/2021, RECEIVED.[3011694] [21-23] [Entered: 01/12/2021 02:33 PM] |
Filing 10 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL, with copy of district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Iris Biton, FILED.[3011688] [21-23] [Entered: 01/12/2021 02:31 PM] |
Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellant, SENT.[3009149] [21-23] [Entered: 01/08/2021 09:59 AM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3009125] [21-23] [Entered: 01/08/2021 09:47 AM] |
Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Iris Biton, district court receipt # 4653154289, FILED.[3009121] [21-23] [Entered: 01/08/2021 09:46 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/01/2020, RECEIVED.[3009119] [21-23] [Entered: 01/08/2021 09:45 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Iris Biton, FILED. [3009111] [21-23] [Entered: 01/08/2021 09:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.