Gatling v. West
| Dana Gatling |
| Timothy M. West, FKA Thomas M. West |
| 21-2457 |
| September 29, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER, [ # 16 ] appeal dismissed for Appellant Dana Gatling failure to pay fee, EFFECTIVE.[3215501] [21-2457] [Entered: 11/19/2021 01:47 PM]
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER, dated 10/21/2021, dismissing appeal by 11/12/2021, unless Appellant Dana Gatling, submits fee or moves to proceed in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3197382] [21-2457] [Entered: 10/21/2021 04:48 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER, dated 10/21/2021, dismissing appeal by 11/12/2021, unless Appellant Dana Gatling, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3197332] [21-2457] [Entered: 10/21/2021 04:25 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER, dated 10/21/2021, dismissing appeal by 11/12/2021, unless Appellant Dana Gatling, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3197311] [21-2457] [Entered: 10/21/2021 04:18 PM]
|
| Filing 13 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Dana Gatling, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [4], from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3197302] [21-2457] [Entered: 10/21/2021 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Timothy M. West, FILED. Service date 10/04/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3185792] [21-2457] [Entered: 10/04/2021 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Brian D. Ginsberg, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[3185661] [21-2457] [Entered: 10/04/2021 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Timothy M. West, FILED. Service date 10/04/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3185650] [21-2457] [Entered: 10/04/2021 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3183836] [21-2457] [Entered: 09/29/2021 07:06 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3183834] [21-2457] [Entered: 09/29/2021 07:04 PM] |
| Filing 5 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [4], on behalf of Appellant Dana Gatling, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3183832] [21-2457] [Entered: 09/29/2021 07:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Dana Gatling, FILED. Service date 09/24/2021 by US mail.[3183831] [21-2457] [Entered: 09/29/2021 06:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 08/31/2021, RECEIVED.[3183827] [21-2457] [Entered: 09/29/2021 06:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Dana Gatling, FILED. [3183826] [21-2457] [Entered: 09/29/2021 06:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gatling v. West | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Dana Gatling | |
| Represented By: | Dana Gatling |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Timothy M. West, FKA Thomas M. West | |
| Represented By: | Barbara D. Underwood |
| Represented By: | Brian David Ginsberg Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
