United States of America v. Latney (Hopkins)
| Terrill Latney, AKA Motis, AKA Mo, Reginald Moore, AKA Swagg, Matthew Pittman, AKA Pearl, Kenneth Belcher, AKA KB, Kotarra Jackson, AKA Red, Charles Gamble, AKA DO, AKA Dog, John Gamble, AKA Bones, Randy Smith, Deon Shorter, Corey Belcher, AKA Dot, Willie Belcher, AKA Thug, Jimmy Dean, AKA Jim Dick, Roger Foster, AKA RJ, Jason Langhorn, AKA Hov and Eric Ross, AKA Smurks |
| United States of America |
| Romaine Hopkins, AKA Foo |
| 21-2562 |
| October 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 10/15/2021 by CM/ECF.[3192973] [21-2562] [Entered: 10/15/2021 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY, Michael Maffei, [ # 5 ], in place of attorney David C. James, SUBSTITUTED.[3192946] [21-2562] [Entered: 10/15/2021 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 10/14/2021 by CM/ECF. [3192767] [21-2562] [Entered: 10/14/2021 05:09 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3192013] [21-2562] [Entered: 10/14/2021 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/05/2021, RECEIVED.[3192008] [21-2562] [Entered: 10/14/2021 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Romaine Hopkins, FILED. [3191997] [21-2562] [Entered: 10/14/2021 09:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
