Milner v. City of Bristol
Shawn Milner |
City of Bristol, Bristol Police Department, Mark Kichar, Podlesney, Officer, Dustin DeMonte, Jason Kasparian, Rodney Gotowala, Geoffrey Lund and Marino, Officer |
21-2610 |
October 18, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to disqualify or recuse judge, to grant summary judgment, to re-open offer proof as a matter of law, [35],[35],[35], on behalf of Appellant Shawn Milner, copy to pro se appellant FILED.[3229451] [21-2610] [Entered: 12/16/2021 02:27 PM] |
Filing 35 MOTION, to disqualify or recuse judge, to grant summary judgment, to re-open offer proof as a matter of law, on behalf of Appellant Shawn Milner, FILED. No Service.[3229449] [21-2610] [Entered: 12/16/2021 02:26 PM] |
Filing 32 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3223855] [21-2610] [Entered: 12/07/2021 08:59 AM] |
Filing 25 LETTER, on behalf of Appellant Shawn Milner, requesting the Court to relieve Alexander T. Taubes as an attorney, RECEIVED. Service date 12/01/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3221136] [21-2610] [Entered: 12/01/2021 08:45 PM] |
Filing 19 ATTORNEY, James N. Tallberg for Geoffrey Lund Bristol Police Department Marino Rodney Gotowala Mark Kichar Dustin DeMonte City of Bristol Jason Kasparian Podlesney, in case 21-2610 James N. Tallberg for Geoffrey Lund Bristol Police Department Marino Rodney Gotowala Mark Kichar Dustin DeMonte City of Bristol Jason Kasparian Podlesney, in case 21-2707, [ # 18 ], ADDED.[3211276] [21-2610, 21-2707] [Entered: 11/15/2021 03:44 PM] |
Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Bristol Police Department, City of Bristol, Dustin DeMonte, Rodney Gotowala, Jason Kasparian, Mark Kichar, Geoffrey Lund, Mr. Marino, Podlesney and Appellant Shawn Milner in 21-2610, 21-2707, FILED. Service date 11/15/2021 by CM/ECF. [3211190] [21-2610, 21-2707] [Entered: 11/15/2021 02:48 PM] |
Filing 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Bristol Police Department, City of Bristol, Dustin DeMonte, Rodney Gotowala, Jason Kasparian, Mark Kichar, Geoffrey Lund, Mr. Marino and Podlesney, FILED. Service date 11/15/2021 by CM/ECF.[3211184] [21-2610] [Entered: 11/15/2021 02:45 PM] |
Filing 16 NOTICE, to Appellee Bristol Police Department, City of Bristol, Dustin DeMonte, Rodney Gotowala, Jason Kasparian, Mark Kichar, Geoffrey Lund, Mr. Marino and Podlesney , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3210555] [21-2610] [Entered: 11/15/2021 09:00 AM] |
Filing 15 ORDER, dated 11/15/2021, dismissing appeal by 11/29/2021, unless Appellant Shawn Milner, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, FILED.[3210547] [21-2610] [Entered: 11/15/2021 08:56 AM] |
Filing 14 ORDER, dated 11/15/2021, dismissing appeal by 11/29/2021, unless Appellant Shawn Milner, submits form D, FILED.[3210540] [21-2610] [Entered: 11/15/2021 08:52 AM] |
Filing 13 ORDER, dated 11/15/2021, dismissing appeal by 11/29/2021, unless Appellant Shawn Milner, submits form C, FILED.[3210533] [21-2610] [Entered: 11/15/2021 08:47 AM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Shawn Milner in 21-2707, FILED. [3201468] [21-2707, 21-2610] [Entered: 10/28/2021 11:34 AM] |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3198298] [21-2610] [Entered: 10/22/2021 04:22 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS, dated 09/24/2021, RECEIVED.[3194540] [21-2610] [Entered: 10/18/2021 03:21 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Shawn Milner, FILED. [3194528] [21-2610] [Entered: 10/18/2021 03:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.