Suber v. VVP Services, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant: Karen M. Suber
Defendant / Appellee: VVP Services, LLC, Vision Venture Partners, LLC, Eleven Stones, LP, Amit Raizada, Stratton Sclavos and Prometheus Ventures, LLC
Case Number: 21-2649
Filed: October 20, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2021 Filing 34 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Karen M. Suber Brief due date as 02/02/2022. Joint Appendix due date as 02/02/2022, FILED.[3215740] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/19/2021 05:50 PM]
November 17, 2021 Filing 31 NEW CASE MANAGER, Dana Ellwood, ASSIGNED.[3213912] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/17/2021 04:47 PM]
November 16, 2021 Filing 30 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, informing Court of proposed due date 02/02/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 11/16/2021 by CM/ECF.[3212657] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/16/2021 11:45 PM]
November 16, 2021 Filing 27 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED. Service date 11/16/2021 by CM/ECF.[3211580] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/16/2021 06:57 AM]
November 8, 2021 Filing 26 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Eleven Stones, LP, Prometheus Ventures, LLC, Amit Raizada, Stratton Sclavos, Vision Venture Partners, LLC and VVP Services, LLC, FILED. Service date 11/08/2021 by email.[3207129] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/08/2021 11:23 AM]
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER, dated 11/08/2021, dismissing appeal by 11/22/2021, unless Appellant Karen M. Suber, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, FILED.[3207101] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/08/2021 11:10 AM]
November 8, 2021 Filing 24 NOTICE, to Appellee Eleven Stones, LP, Prometheus Ventures, LLC, Amit Raizada, Stratton Sclavos, VVP Services, LLC and Vision Venture Partners, LLC , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3207097] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/08/2021 11:04 AM]
November 4, 2021 Filing 21 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM D [ # 12 ], [ # 17 ], [ # 19 ], on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED.[3206067] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/04/2021 04:24 PM]
November 4, 2021 Filing 20 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM C [ # 11 ], [ # 16 ], [ # 18 ], on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED.[3206060] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/04/2021 04:22 PM]
November 4, 2021 Filing 19 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED. Service date 11/03/2021 by CM/ECF.[3205919] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/04/2021 02:14 PM]
November 4, 2021 Filing 18 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED. Service date 11/03/2021 by CM/ECF.[3205918] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/04/2021 02:13 PM]
November 4, 2021 Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D, [15], on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED.[3205812] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/04/2021 12:35 PM]
November 4, 2021 Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C, [14], on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED.[3205803] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/04/2021 12:31 PM]
November 3, 2021 Filing 15 CORRECTED FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED. Service date 11/03/2021 by CM/ECF.[3205317] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/03/2021 07:58 PM]
November 3, 2021 Filing 14 CORRECTED FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED. Service date 11/03/2021 by CM/ECF.[3205315] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/03/2021 07:54 PM]
November 3, 2021 Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D, [9], on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED.[3205193] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/03/2021 04:30 PM]
November 3, 2021 Filing 11 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C, [8], on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED.[3205184] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/03/2021 04:26 PM]
November 3, 2021 Filing 9 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED. Service date 11/03/2021 by CM/ECF.[3204555] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/03/2021 09:56 AM]
November 3, 2021 Filing 8 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED. Service date 11/03/2021 by CM/ECF.[3204550] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/03/2021 09:53 AM]
November 2, 2021 Filing 7 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, district court receipt # ANYSDC-25272567, FILED.[3204197] [21-2649] [Entered: 11/02/2021 03:44 PM]
October 21, 2021 Filing 5 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Amos N. Jones, Esq. for Appellant Karen M. Suber, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3196984] [21-2649] [Entered: 10/21/2021 12:54 PM]
October 20, 2021 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3196963] [21-2649] [Entered: 10/21/2021 12:41 PM]
October 20, 2021 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 09/27/2021, RECEIVED.[3196961] [21-2649] [Entered: 10/21/2021 12:39 PM]
October 20, 2021 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, dated 09/27/2021, RECEIVED.[3196960] [21-2649] [Entered: 10/21/2021 12:38 PM]
October 20, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Karen M. Suber, FILED. [3196953] [21-2649] [Entered: 10/21/2021 12:35 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Suber v. VVP Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Karen M. Suber
Represented By: Amos N. Jones Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: VVP Services, LLC
Represented By: Michael John Passarella Esq.
Represented By: Theresa Van Vliet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Vision Venture Partners, LLC
Represented By: Michael John Passarella Esq.
Represented By: Theresa Van Vliet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Eleven Stones, LP
Represented By: Michael John Passarella Esq.
Represented By: Theresa Van Vliet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Amit Raizada
Represented By: Michael John Passarella Esq.
Represented By: Theresa Van Vliet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Stratton Sclavos
Represented By: Michael John Passarella Esq.
Represented By: Theresa Van Vliet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Prometheus Ventures, LLC
Represented By: Michael John Passarella Esq.
Represented By: Theresa Van Vliet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?