Kane v. de Blasio
Michael Kane, William Castro, Margaret Chu, Heather Clark, Stephanie Di Capua, Robert Gladding, Nwakaego Nwaifejokwu, Ingrid Romero, Trinidad Smith and Amaryllis Ruiz-Toro |
Bill de Blasio, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of New York, David Chokshi, in his official capacity of Health Commissioner of the City of New York and New York City Department of Education |
21-2678 |
October 25, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing 16 MOTION, for injunction, on behalf of Appellant William Castro, Margaret Chu, Heather Clark, Stephanie Di Capua, Robert Gladding, Michael Kane, Nwakaego Nwaifejokwu, Ingrid Romero, Amaryllis Ruiz-Toro and Trinidad Smith, FILED. Service date 10/26/2021 by CM/ECF. [3200337] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/26/2021 10:04 PM] |
Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant William Castro, Margaret Chu, Heather Clark, Stephanie Di Capua, Robert Gladding, Michael Kane, Nwakaego Nwaifejokwu, Ingrid Romero, Amaryllis Ruiz-Toro and Trinidad Smith, FILED. Service date 10/26/2021 by CM/ECF.[3200336] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/26/2021 10:00 PM] |
Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Devin Slack for David Chokshi, Bill de Blasio and New York City Department of Education, in case 21-2678, [ # 13 ], ADDED.[3199598] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/26/2021 12:07 PM] |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee David Chokshi, Bill de Blasio and New York City Department of Education, FILED. Service date 10/26/2021 by CM/ECF. [3199592] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/26/2021 12:05 PM] |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Richard Paul Dearing for David Chokshi, Bill de Blasio and New York City Department of Education, in case 21-2678, [ # 11 ], ADDED.[3199560] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/26/2021 11:55 AM] |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Bill de Blasio, David Chokshi and New York City Department of Education, FILED. Service date 10/26/2021 by CM/ECF. [3199554] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/26/2021 11:52 AM] |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Susan Paulson, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney Georgia Mary Pestana, SUBSTITUTED.[3199282] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/26/2021 09:10 AM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee David Chokshi, Bill de Blasio and New York City Department of Education, FILED. Service date 10/26/2021 by CM/ECF. [3199196] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/26/2021 07:55 AM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3199110] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/25/2021 05:47 PM] |
Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellants William Castro, Margaret Chu, Heather Clark, Stephanie Di Capua, Robert Gladding, Michael Kane, Nwakaego Nwaifejokwu, Ingrid Romero, Amaryllis Ruiz-Toro and Trinidad Smith, district court receipt # ANYSDC-25239405, FILED.[3199065] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/25/2021 04:42 PM] |
Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 10/12/2021, RECEIVED.[3199061] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/25/2021 04:42 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 10/06/2021, RECEIVED.[3199060] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/25/2021 04:41 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 10/04/2021, RECEIVED.[3199059] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/25/2021 04:40 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellants William Castro, Margaret Chu, Heather Clark, Stephanie Di Capua, Robert Gladding, Michael Kane, Nwakaego Nwaifejokwu, Ingrid Romero, Amaryllis Ruiz-Toro and Trinidad Smith, FILED. [3199053] [21-2678] [Entered: 10/25/2021 04:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.