Goldberg v. City of New York
| John or Jane Does 1-10, in their individual and official capacities as police officers |
| Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins |
| City of New York and Ryan Mclasky, in his individual and official capacity as police officer |
| 21-2749 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, FILED. Service date 12/28/2021 by CM/ECF.[3234299] [21-2749] [Entered: 12/28/2021 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 20 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM D, [ # 18 ], on behalf of Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, FILED.[3234017] [21-2749] [Entered: 12/28/2021 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 19 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM C, [ # 17 ], on behalf of Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, FILED.[3234013] [21-2749] [Entered: 12/28/2021 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 18 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, FILED. Service date 12/27/2021 by CM/ECF.[3233849] [21-2749] [Entered: 12/27/2021 11:10 PM] |
| Filing 17 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, FILED. Service date 12/27/2021 by CM/ECF.[3233848] [21-2749] [Entered: 12/27/2021 11:09 PM] |
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D, [14], on behalf of Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, FILED.[3231257] [21-2749] [Entered: 12/21/2021 08:24 AM] |
| Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C, [13], on behalf of Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, FILED.[3231254] [21-2749] [Entered: 12/21/2021 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 14 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, FILED. Service date 12/20/2021 by CM/ECF.[3231227] [21-2749] [Entered: 12/20/2021 11:30 PM] |
| Filing 13 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, FILED. Service date 12/20/2021 by CM/ECF.[3231226] [21-2749] [Entered: 12/20/2021 11:30 PM] |
Filing 12
ORDER, dated 12/06/2021, dismissing appeal by 12/20/2021, unless Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, submit the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, FILED.[3223490] [21-2749] [Entered: 12/06/2021 01:18 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER, dated 12/06/2021, dismissing appeal by 12/20/2021, unless Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, submit Form D, FILED.[3223486] [21-2749] [Entered: 12/06/2021 01:15 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER, dated 12/06/2021, dismissing appeal by 12/20/2021, unless Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, submit Form C, FILED.[3223479] [21-2749] [Entered: 12/06/2021 01:11 PM]
|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Janet L. Zaleon, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney Georgia M. Pestana, SUBSTITUTED.[3212603] [21-2749] [Entered: 11/16/2021 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee City of New York and Ryan Mclasky, FILED. Service date 11/16/2021 by CM/ECF. [3212391] [21-2749] [Entered: 11/16/2021 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3203831] [21-2749] [Entered: 11/02/2021 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, district court receipt # ANYSDC-2527030, FILED.[3203830] [21-2749] [Entered: 11/02/2021 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, dated 09/30/2021, RECEIVED.[3203826] [21-2749] [Entered: 11/02/2021 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Anwyn Goldberg and Solomon Watkins, FILED. [3203818] [21-2749] [Entered: 11/02/2021 11:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
