Doe v. Pisani
James Doe, Mother Doe, John Doe, Jane Doe and Youngest Child Doe |
Gladys Pisani, Daniel McAnaspie and Joseph Joudy |
21-2847 |
November 16, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 STAY STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 12/17/2021, on behalf of Appellants Joseph Joudy, Daniel McAnaspie and Gladys Pisani, informing the Court that the motion for reconsideration is still pending in the Distict Court, RECEIVED. Service date 12/17/2021 by CM/ECF.[3230221] [21-2847] [Entered: 12/17/2021 02:27 PM] |
Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Joudy, Daniel McAnaspie and Gladys Pisani, FILED. Service date 11/29/2021 by CM/ECF.[3219132] [21-2847] [Entered: 11/29/2021 04:30 PM] |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3214304] [21-2847] [Entered: 11/18/2021 11:10 AM] |
Filing 6 FRAP 4(a)4 NOTICE, to Appellants Joseph Joudy, Daniel McAnaspie and Gladys Pisani, copy to District Court, SENT.[3212901] [21-2847] [Entered: 11/17/2021 10:25 AM] |
Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellants Joseph Joudy, Daniel McAnaspie and Gladys Pisani, district court receipt # ACTDC-6724807, FILED.[3212645] [21-2847] [Entered: 11/16/2021 10:39 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT RULING, dated 10/15/2021, RECEIVED.[3212644] [21-2847] [Entered: 11/16/2021 10:37 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellants Joseph Joudy, Daniel McAnaspie and Gladys Pisani, FILED. [3212643] [21-2847] [Entered: 11/16/2021 10:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.