United States of America v. Best (Acosta-Banda)
| Wallace Best, AKA Coop, Jeffrey Thomas, AKA Zig, Oscar Zavala, AKA Manuel Garcia Martinez, AKA Oscar Rangel Zavala, AKA Oscar Zavala Rangel, Gustavo Gonzalez-Yanez, Jesus Mendez, David Azarias Morales-Verdugo, Frank Jamont Best, AKA JB, AKA Cash, Tomasz Turowski and Jason Cox |
| United States of America |
| Constantino Acosta-Banda |
| 21-2883 |
| November 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION, to be relieved as attorney, on behalf of Appellant Constantino Acosta-Banda in 21-566, 21-2883, FILED. Service date 11/24/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3217982] [21-566, 21-2883] [Entered: 11/24/2021 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Constantino Acosta-Banda in 21-566, 21-2883, FILED. Service date 11/24/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3217893] [21-566, 21-2883] [Entered: 11/24/2021 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTE: See lead case, 21-566, containing complete set of docket entries.[3216660] [21-2883] [Entered: 11/23/2021 06:09 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3216659] [21-2883] [Entered: 11/23/2021 06:06 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 11/16/2021, RECEIVED.[3216658] [21-2883] [Entered: 11/23/2021 06:03 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Constantino Acosta-Banda in 21-2883, FILED. [3216657] [21-2883, 21-566] [Entered: 11/23/2021 05:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
