United States of America v. John Doe
Saquan Wallace, Keiha Laviscount, Diane McIntosh, AKA Jamaica, AKA Choco, Alice Macelree, Melvin Upsher, Sam Credell, AKA J.R., Victoria Hernandez, James Exum, Lee Jaudon, AKA Poppy, AKA Pressure, Reshonnah Harvey, AKA Precious and Katoria McCallum, AKA Doe 06 CR 122-12 |
United States of America |
John Doe and Kaywan Wallace |
21-2884 |
November 22, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 11/23/2021 by CM/ECF.[3217260] [21-2884] [Entered: 11/23/2021 03:14 PM] |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3216919] [21-2884] [Entered: 11/23/2021 11:21 AM] |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY, Nadia Moore, [ # 5 ], in place of attorney David C. James, SUBSTITUTED.[3216891] [21-2884] [Entered: 11/23/2021 11:03 AM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 11/23/2021 by CM/ECF. [3216824] [21-2884] [Entered: 11/23/2021 10:25 AM] |
Filing 3 NOTE: See lead case, 20-3021, containing complete set of docket entries.[3216713] [21-2884] [Entered: 11/23/2021 09:09 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION & ORDER, dated 11/04/2021, RECEIVED.[3216712] [21-2884] [Entered: 11/23/2021 09:09 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Kaywan Wallace in 20-3021, FILED. [3216709] [21-2884, 20-3021] [Entered: 11/23/2021 09:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.