Joseph v. Rikers Island Correctional Fac
| Anderson Joseph |
| Rikers Island Correctional Facility |
| 21-2938 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [15], on behalf of Appellant Anderson Joseph, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3249961] [21-2938] [Entered: 01/26/2022 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Anderson Joseph, FILED. Service date 01/24/2022 by US mail.[3249959] [21-2938] [Entered: 01/26/2022 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 14 UNDELIVERABLE MAIL, forwarding time expired return to sender, for Anderson Joseph, to USCA from USPS, RECEIVED.[3234968] [21-2938] [Entered: 12/29/2021 11:14 AM] |
Filing 13
ORDER, dated 12/28/2021, dismissing appeal by 01/18/2022, unless appellant Anderson Joseph, submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3234426] [21-2938] [Entered: 12/28/2021 02:44 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER, dated 12/28/2021, dismissing appeal by 01/18/2022, unless appellant Anderson Joseph, submits form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3234419] [21-2938] [Entered: 12/28/2021 02:38 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER, dated 12/28/2021, dismissing appeal by 01/18/2022, unless appellant Anderson Joseph, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3234412] [21-2938] [Entered: 12/28/2021 02:29 PM]
|
| Filing 9 UNDELIVERABLE MAIL, forwarding time expired return to sender, for Anderson Joseph, to USCA from USPS, RECEIVED.[3233554] [21-2938] [Entered: 12/27/2021 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Georgia Mary Pestana, for Rikers Island Correctional Facility, TERMINATED.[3227539] [21-2938] [Entered: 12/14/2021 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 7 LETTER, dated 12/13/2021, on behalf of Appellee Rikers Island Correctional Facility, requesting that the New York Law Department no longer be identified as counsel for the appellee, RECEIVED. No service.[3227538] [21-2938] [Entered: 12/14/2021 08:57 AM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3219606] [21-2938] [Entered: 11/30/2021 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3219600] [21-2938] [Entered: 11/30/2021 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/12/2021, RECEIVED.[3219592] [21-2938] [Entered: 11/30/2021 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Anderson Joseph, FILED. [3219585] [21-2938] [Entered: 11/30/2021 11:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Joseph v. Rikers Island Correctional Fac | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Anderson Joseph | |
| Represented By: | Anderson Joseph |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Rikers Island Correctional Facility | |
| Represented By: | Georgia Mary Pestana Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
