Oakley v. Dolan
Charles Oakley |
James Dolan, in his individual capacity, in his professional capacity, MSG Networks, Inc., Madison Square Garden Company and MSG Sports & Entertainment, LLC |
21-2939 |
November 24, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Charles Oakley Brief due date as 03/08/2022. Joint Appendix due date as 03/08/2022, FILED.[3231813] [21-2939]--[Edited 12/21/2021 by WD] [Entered: 12/21/2021 03:06 PM] |
Filing 24 NEW CASE MANAGER, Wilson Dudley ASSIGNED.[3231804] [21-2939] [Entered: 12/21/2021 03:01 PM] |
Filing 21 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Charles Oakley, informing Court of proposed due date 03/08/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 12/15/2021 by CM/ECF.[3229013] [21-2939] [Entered: 12/15/2021 06:39 PM] |
Filing 18 ATTORNEY, Renan F. Varghese for Charles Oakley, in case 21-2939 , [ # 15 ], ADDED.[3225592] [21-2939] [Entered: 12/09/2021 11:18 AM] |
Filing 17 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Charles Oakley, FILED. Service date 12/08/2021 by CM/ECF.[3225357] [21-2939] [Entered: 12/08/2021 08:10 PM] |
Filing 16 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Charles Oakley, FILED. Service date 12/08/2021 by CM/ECF.[3225356] [21-2939] [Entered: 12/08/2021 08:08 PM] |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Charles Oakley, FILED. Service date 12/08/2021 by CM/ECF. [3225354] [21-2939] [Entered: 12/08/2021 08:04 PM] |
Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Charles Oakley, FILED. Service date 12/08/2021 by CM/ECF.[3225353] [21-2939] [Entered: 12/08/2021 08:02 PM] |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Akiva Shapiro for James Dolan MSG Networks, Inc. MSG Sports & Entertainment, LLC Madison Square Garden Company, in case 21-2939 , [ # 12 ], ADDED.[3220901] [21-2939] [Entered: 12/01/2021 03:51 PM] |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee James Dolan, Madison Square Garden Company, MSG Networks, Inc. and MSG Sports & Entertainment, LLC, FILED. Service date 12/01/2021 by CM/ECF. [3220806] [21-2939] [Entered: 12/01/2021 02:45 PM] |
Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee James Dolan, Madison Square Garden Company, MSG Networks, Inc. and MSG Sports & Entertainment, LLC, FILED. Service date 12/01/2021 by CM/ECF.[3220801] [21-2939] [Entered: 12/01/2021 02:40 PM] |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Randy Michael Mastro for James Dolan MSG Networks, Inc. MSG Sports & Entertainment, LLC Madison Square Garden Company, in case 21-2939 , [ # 9 ], ADDED.[3220770] [21-2939] [Entered: 12/01/2021 02:12 PM] |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee James Dolan, Madison Square Garden Company, MSG Networks, Inc. and MSG Sports & Entertainment, LLC, FILED. Service date 12/01/2021 by CM/ECF. [3220765] [21-2939] [Entered: 12/01/2021 02:06 PM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3219775] [21-2939] [Entered: 11/30/2021 12:52 PM] |
Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Charles Oakley, district court receipt # ANYSDC-25381687, FILED.[3219658] [21-2939] [Entered: 11/30/2021 11:56 AM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 11/22/2021, RECEIVED.[3219657] [21-2939] [Entered: 11/30/2021 11:55 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 11/08/2021, RECEIVED.[3219655] [21-2939] [Entered: 11/30/2021 11:55 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Charles Oakley, FILED. [3219637] [21-2939] [Entered: 11/30/2021 11:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.