Tellier v. United States of America
| Robin Scott Tellier |
| United States of America |
| 21-2951 |
| November 30, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 ATTORNEY, Kaylan Lasky for United States of America, in case 21-2951, [ # 21 ], ADDED.[3242881] [21-2951] [Entered: 01/12/2022 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 01/12/2022 by CM/ECF. [3242781] [21-2951] [Entered: 01/12/2022 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 20 NOTICE, to Appellee United States of America , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3242646] [21-2951] [Entered: 01/12/2022 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to extend time until 02/04/2022 to file a motion for certificate of appealability [ # 15 ] filed by Appellant Robin Scott Tellier, by MP, FILED. [3240980][19] [21-2951] [Entered: 01/10/2022 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION, to extend time, on behalf of Appellant Robin Scott Tellier, FILED. Service date 01/05/2022 by CM/ECF. [3238409] [21-2951] [Entered: 01/05/2022 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION ORDER, denying Appellant Robin Scott Tellier motion to hold appeal in abeyance [ # 10 ] , by WJN, FILED. [3237852][14] [21-2951] [Entered: 01/05/2022 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION, to hold appeal in abeyance, on behalf of Appellant Robin Scott Tellier, FILED. Service date 12/21/2021 by CM/ECF. [3231694] [21-2951] [Entered: 12/21/2021 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 9 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Robin Scott Tellier, FILED. Service date 12/10/2021 by CM/ECF.[3226428] [21-2951] [Entered: 12/10/2021 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 8 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Robin Scott Tellier, FILED. Service date 12/10/2021 by CM/ECF.[3226427] [21-2951] [Entered: 12/10/2021 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Matthew Brady Larsen for Robin Scott Tellier, in case 21-2951, [ # 6 ], ADDED.[3221885] [21-2951] [Entered: 12/03/2021 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Robin Scott Tellier, FILED. Service date 12/02/2021 by CM/ECF. [3221672] [21-2951] [Entered: 12/02/2021 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3220328] [21-2951] [Entered: 12/01/2021 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, dated 10/05/2021, RECEIVED.[3220320] [21-2951] [Entered: 12/01/2021 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Robin Scott Tellier, FILED. [3220314] [21-2951] [Entered: 12/01/2021 08:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Tellier v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Robin Scott Tellier | |
| Represented By: | Barry D. Leiwant |
| Represented By: | Matthew Brady Larsen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Won S. Shin |
| Represented By: | Kaylan Lasky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
