Washington v. Pelella
Malcolm Washington |
William Pelella, Judge |
21-3073 |
December 21, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT, on behalf of Appellant Malcolm Washington, FILED. Service date 01/19/2022 by US mail.[3246698] [21-3073] [Entered: 01/20/2022 11:46 AM] |
Filing 13 CERTIFIED PRISONER AUTHORIZATION FORM, dated 01/06/2022, to Franklin Correctional Facility In Care of Warden , ISSUED.[3238735] [21-3073] [Entered: 01/06/2022 09:55 AM] |
Filing 14 MOTION, for assignment of pro bono counsel, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Malcolm Washington, FILED. Service date 12/28/2021 by US mail.[3238752] [21-3073] [Entered: 01/06/2022 10:10 AM] |
Filing 12 PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT AUTHORIZATION FORM, FILED. Service date 12/29/2021 by US mail.[3238718] [21-3073] [Entered: 01/06/2022 09:44 AM] |
Filing 11 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Malcolm Washington, informing Court of proposed due date 03/29/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 12/29/2021 by US mail.[3238712] [21-3073] [Entered: 01/06/2022 09:43 AM] |
Filing 10 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Malcolm Washington, FILED. Service date 12/29/2021 by US mail.[3238709] [21-3073] [Entered: 01/06/2022 09:41 AM] |
Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Malcolm Washington, FILED. Service date 12/29/2021 by US mail.[3238706] [21-3073] [Entered: 01/06/2022 09:41 AM] |
Filing 6 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee William Pelella, Appellee respectfully request that the Court removes this Office as counsel and designate the defendant-appellee only as a defendant. RECEIVED. Service date 12/23/2021 by US mail.[3232867] [21-3073] [Entered: 12/24/2021 11:53 AM] |
Filing 7 LETTER, dated 12/14/2021, on behalf of Appellant Malcolm Washington, Appellant would like a status update on the case, RECEIVED. Service date 12/14/2021 by US mail.[3233096] [21-3073] [Entered: 12/27/2021 10:17 AM] |
Filing 5 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[3231457] [21-3073] [Entered: 12/21/2021 10:45 AM] |
Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3231452] [21-3073] [Entered: 12/21/2021 10:39 AM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 09/17/2021, RECEIVED.[3231451] [21-3073] [Entered: 12/21/2021 10:38 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER ON REPORT & RECOMMENDATION, dated 09/17/2021, RECEIVED.[3231449] [21-3073] [Entered: 12/21/2021 10:37 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Malcolm Washington, FILED. [3231442] [21-3073] [Entered: 12/21/2021 10:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Washington v. Pelella | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Malcolm Washington | |
Represented By: | Malcolm Washington |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: William Pelella, Judge | |
Represented By: | Barbara D. Underwood |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.