May v. Griffin
Elliot May |
Thomas Griffin, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility |
21-3084 |
December 21, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, to extend time, [15], [15], on behalf of Appellant Elliot May, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3255561] [21-3084] [Entered: 02/03/2022 04:50 PM] |
Filing 15 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, to extend time, on behalf of Appellant Elliot May, FILED. Service date 02/01/2022 by US mail.[3255556] [21-3084] [Entered: 02/03/2022 04:47 PM] |
Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Elliot May, FILED. Service date 02/01/2022 by US mail.[3255540] [21-3084] [Entered: 02/03/2022 04:38 PM] |
Filing 13 ORDER, dated 01/25/2022, dismissing appeal by 02/15/2022, unless Appellant Elliot May, moves for Certificate of Appealability, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3249621] [21-3084] [Entered: 01/25/2022 03:05 PM] |
Filing 12 ORDER, dated 01/25/2022, dismissing appeal by 02/15/2022, unless Appellant Elliot May, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3249615] [21-3084] [Entered: 01/25/2022 02:58 PM] |
Filing 11 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Elliot May, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [4], from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3245374] [21-3084] [Entered: 01/19/2022 09:43 AM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE, to Appellee Thomas Griffin, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3237801] [21-3084] [Entered: 01/05/2022 09:55 AM] |
Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3231982] [21-3084] [Entered: 12/21/2021 06:10 PM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3231980] [21-3084] [Entered: 12/21/2021 06:09 PM] |
Filing 5 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [4], on behalf of Appellant Elliot May, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3231979] [21-3084] [Entered: 12/21/2021 06:06 PM] |
Filing 4 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Elliot May, FILED. Service date 12/12/2021 by US mail.[3231977] [21-3084] [Entered: 12/21/2021 06:05 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 11/19/2021, RECEIVED.[3231976] [21-3084] [Entered: 12/21/2021 06:04 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION, dated 11/19/2021, RECEIVED.[3231975] [21-3084] [Entered: 12/21/2021 06:04 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Elliot May, FILED. [3231973] [21-3084] [Entered: 12/21/2021 06:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: May v. Griffin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Elliot May | |
Represented By: | Elliot May |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Thomas Griffin, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility | |
Represented By: | John James Sergi Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.