Lewis v. GMAC Mortgage Corporation, LLC
Sidney T. Lewis |
GMAC Mortgage Corporation, LLC, Et. al. |
21-3093 |
December 21, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to transfer, [20], on behalf of Appellant Sidney T. Lewis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3253158] [21-3093] [Entered: 01/31/2022 04:34 PM] |
Filing 20 MOTION, to transfer, on behalf of Appellant Sidney T. Lewis, FILED. Service date 01/27/2022 by US mail.[3253156] [21-3093] [Entered: 01/31/2022 04:33 PM] |
Filing 19 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Sidney T. Lewis, informing Court of proposed due date 02/01/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 01/27/2022 by US mail.[3252911] [21-3093] [Entered: 01/31/2022 02:16 PM] |
Filing 18 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Sidney T. Lewis, FILED. Service date 01/27/2022 by US mail.[3252906] [21-3093] [Entered: 01/31/2022 02:15 PM] |
Filing 17 APPENDIX, volume 1 of 1, (pp. 1-30), on behalf of Appellant Sidney T. Lewis, FILED. Service date 01/11/2022 by US mail.[3243527] [21-3093] [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:53 PM] |
Filing 16 BRIEF, on behalf of Appellant Sidney T. Lewis, FILED. Service date 01/11/2022 by US mail. [3243523] [21-3093] [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:51 PM] |
Filing 15 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of filer Appellant Sidney T. Lewis, FILED. Service date 01/11/2022 by US mail. [3243517] [21-3093] [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:44 PM] |
Filing 14 ORDER, dated 01/12/2022, dismissing appeal by 02/02/2022, unless Appellant Sidney T. Lewis, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3242632] [21-3093] [Entered: 01/12/2022 01:12 PM] |
Filing 12 LETTER, dated 12/16/2021, on behalf of Appellant Sidney T. Lewis, informing the Court that a Notice of Appeal will be filed at the Court of Appeals, RECEIVED. Service date 12/16/2021 by US mail.[3233958] [21-3093] [Entered: 12/28/2021 09:25 AM] |
Filing 8 PAPERS, Notice of Appeal, RECEIVED.[3232751] [21-3093] [Entered: 12/22/2021 05:05 PM] |
Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3232189] [21-3093] [Entered: 12/22/2021 10:05 AM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3232186] [21-3093] [Entered: 12/22/2021 10:03 AM] |
Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Sidney T. Lewis, district court receipt # 465401291033, FILED.[3232184] [21-3093] [Entered: 12/22/2021 10:03 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 11/19/2021, RECEIVED.[3232181] [21-3093] [Entered: 12/22/2021 10:02 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Sidney T. Lewis, FILED. [3232171] [21-3093] [Entered: 12/22/2021 09:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Lewis v. GMAC Mortgage Corporation, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Sidney T. Lewis | |
Represented By: | Sidney T. Lewis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: GMAC Mortgage Corporation, LLC, Et. al. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.