Shenko v. Village
| Linda J. Shenko |
| Yorkville Village, Municipality, Municipality of Town of New Hartford, Officer Austin Szkotak, Yorkville P.D. officer and personally, Officer Capelli, New Hartford P.D. officer and personally, Yorkville Police Department, New Hartford Police Department, John Does, all unnamed agents, contractors, informers, paid and unpaid by above in relation to plaintiff, Oneida County, Oneida County Sheriff Department, Sheriff Robert Maciol, in their official capacities and individually, Sue Gooding, in their official capacities and individually, Lieutenant Paravati, in their official capacities and individually, Deputy Edward Constantine, in their official capacities and individually and Deputy Lisa Pearsall, in their official capacities and individually |
| 21-3100 |
| December 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION, for request to file relief, for procedural clarification relief, [17],[17], on behalf of Appellant Linda J. Shenko, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3260948] [21-3100] [Entered: 02/15/2022 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 19 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, FORM D-P, [15], on behalf of Appellant Linda J. Shenko, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3260945] [21-3100] [Entered: 02/15/2022 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, [14], on behalf of Appellant Linda J. Shenko, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3260937] [21-3100] [Entered: 02/15/2022 08:21 AM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION, for request to file relief, for procedural clarification relief, on behalf of Appellant Linda J. Shenko, FILED. No Service.[3260936] [21-3100] [Entered: 02/15/2022 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 16 PAPERS, Documents regarding district court filings, RECEIVED.[3260142] [21-3100] [Entered: 02/11/2022 05:07 PM] |
| Filing 15 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Linda J. Shenko, FILED. No Service.[3260116] [21-3100] [Entered: 02/11/2022 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Linda J. Shenko, FILED. Service date 02/01/2022 by US mail.[3260114] [21-3100] [Entered: 02/11/2022 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 9 DISTRICT COURT TEXT ORDER, dated 01/11/2022, entered as docket entry 101, granting IFP, RECEIVED.[3251001] [21-3100] [Entered: 01/27/2022 12:50 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER, dated 01/07/2022, dismissing appeal by 01/28/2022, unless Appellant Linda J. Shenko submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3239565] [21-3100] [Entered: 01/07/2022 10:20 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER, dated 01/07/2022, dismissing appeal by 01/28/2022, unless Appellant Linda J. Shenko submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3239559] [21-3100] [Entered: 01/07/2022 10:18 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER, dated 01/07/2022, dismissing appeal by 01/28/2022, unless Appellant Linda J. Shenko submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3239534] [21-3100] [Entered: 01/07/2022 09:59 AM]
|
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3232473] [21-3100] [Entered: 12/22/2021 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3232463] [21-3100] [Entered: 12/22/2021 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 11/16/2021, RECEIVED.[3232455] [21-3100] [Entered: 12/22/2021 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 11/16/2021, RECEIVED.[3232453] [21-3100] [Entered: 12/22/2021 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Linda J. Shenko, FILED. [3232441] [21-3100] [Entered: 12/22/2021 12:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
