United States of America v. Shapiro (Gramins)
| Ross Shapiro and Tyler Peters |
| United States of America |
| Michael Gramins |
| 21-5 |
| January 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Michael Gramins, FILED. Service date 01/15/2021 by CM/ECF. [3015317] [21-5] [Entered: 01/15/2021 09:11 PM] |
| Filing 20 ATTORNEY, Melina Maria Meneguin Layerenza for Appellant Michael Gramins, in case 21-5, [ # 19 ], ADDED.[3014968] [21-5] [Entered: 01/15/2021 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Michael Gramins, FILED. Service date 01/15/2021 by CM/ECF. [3014874] [21-5] [Entered: 01/15/2021 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 18 ATTORNEY, Aimee W. Brown for Appellant Michael Gramins, in case 21-5, [ # 17 ], ADDED.[3014701] [21-5] [Entered: 01/15/2021 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Michael Gramins, FILED. Service date 01/15/2021 by CM/ECF. [3014698] [21-5] [Entered: 01/15/2021 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Michael Gramins, FILED. Service date 01/15/2021 by CM/ECF.[3014673] [21-5] [Entered: 01/15/2021 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 15 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, [ # 12 ], [ # 13 ], on behalf of Appellant Michael Gramins, FILED.[3014557] [21-5] [Entered: 01/15/2021 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Kannon K. Shanmugam, [ # 10 ], in place of attorney Marc Lee Mukasey, SUBSTITUTED.[3014556] [21-5] [Entered: 01/15/2021 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 13 LETTER, on behalf of Appellant Michael Gramins, indicating that Kannon K. Shanmugam will be substituting in for Marc Lee Mukasey, RECEIVED. Service date 01/14/2021 by CM/ECF.[3014361] [21-5] [Entered: 01/15/2021 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel, [11], on behalf of Appellant Michael Gramins, FILED.[3014244] [21-5] [Entered: 01/15/2021 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Michael Gramins, FILED. Service date 01/14/2021 by CM/ECF. [3014115] [21-5] [Entered: 01/14/2021 07:04 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Michael Gramins, FILED. Service date 01/14/2021 by CM/ECF. [3013454] [21-5] [Entered: 01/14/2021 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Heather Cherry for Appellee United States of America, in case 21-5, [ # 8 ], ADDED.[3009281] [21-5] [Entered: 01/08/2021 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 01/08/2021 by CM/ECF. [3009007] [21-5] [Entered: 01/08/2021 08:14 AM] |
| Filing 7 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Michael Gramins, district court receipt # CTXH00017615, FILED.[3008643] [21-5] [Entered: 01/07/2021 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY, David E. Novick for Appellee United States of America, in case 21-5, [ # 5 ], ADDED.[3008528] [21-5] [Entered: 01/07/2021 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 01/07/2021 by CM/ECF. [3008440] [21-5] [Entered: 01/07/2021 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3007560] [21-5] [Entered: 01/06/2021 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/30/2020, RECEIVED.[3007558] [21-5] [Entered: 01/06/2021 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Michael Gramins, FILED. [3007552] [21-5] [Entered: 01/06/2021 03:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.