Hall v. Miller
Petitioner / Appellant: Royal Daniel Hall
Respondent / Appellee: Christopher Miller
Case Number: 21-515
Filed: March 2, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER, dated 04/13/2021, dismissing appeal by 05/04/2021, unless Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, submits Acknowlegdment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3076526] [21-515] [Entered: 04/13/2021 02:40 PM]
April 13, 2021 Filing 28 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, Form D-P, [12], from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3076518] [21-515] [Entered: 04/13/2021 02:36 PM]
April 13, 2021 Filing 27 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, [11], from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3076514] [21-515] [Entered: 04/13/2021 02:34 PM]
April 13, 2021 Filing 26 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [10], from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3076508] [21-515] [Entered: 04/13/2021 02:30 PM]
April 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER, dated 04/08/2021, dismissing appeal by 04/29/2021, unless Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, moves for certificate of appealability, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3073707] [21-515] [Entered: 04/08/2021 03:35 PM]
March 31, 2021 Filing 20 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, [ # 17 ], [ # 18 ], on behalf of Appellee Christopher Miller, FILED.[3067570] [21-515] [Entered: 03/31/2021 01:38 PM]
March 31, 2021 Filing 19 ATTORNEY, Kirsten A. Rappleyea, [ # 18 ], in place of attorney Barbard D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[3067569] [21-515] [Entered: 03/31/2021 01:37 PM]
March 31, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Christopher Miller, FILED. Service date 03/29/2021 by US mail. [3067562] [21-515] [Entered: 03/31/2021 01:30 PM]
March 30, 2021 Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance for Substitute Counsel, [16], on behalf of Appellee Christopher Miller, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3066458] [21-515] [Entered: 03/30/2021 11:10 AM]
March 29, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Christopher Miller, FILED. Service date 03/29/2021 by US mail. [3065820] [21-515] [Entered: 03/29/2021 03:21 PM]
March 19, 2021 Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [12], on behalf of Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3060365] [21-515] [Entered: 03/19/2021 04:06 PM]
March 19, 2021 Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, [11], on behalf of Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3060361] [21-515] [Entered: 03/19/2021 04:04 PM]
March 19, 2021 Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [10], on behalf of Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3060350] [21-515] [Entered: 03/19/2021 04:00 PM]
March 18, 2021 Filing 12 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, FILED. Service date 03/15/2021 by US mail.[3060344] [21-515] [Entered: 03/19/2021 03:57 PM]
March 18, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, FILED. Service date 03/15/2021 by US mail.[3060340] [21-515] [Entered: 03/19/2021 03:57 PM]
March 18, 2021 Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, FILED. Service date 03/15/2021 by US mail.[3060336] [21-515] [Entered: 03/19/2021 03:56 PM]
March 4, 2021 Filing 8 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellant, SENT.[3049123] [21-515] [Entered: 03/04/2021 02:43 PM]
March 4, 2021 Filing 7 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, [ # 3 ], on behalf of Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3049107] [21-515] [Entered: 03/04/2021 02:29 PM]
March 3, 2021 Filing 6 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3049103] [21-515] [Entered: 03/04/2021 02:26 PM]
March 3, 2021 Filing 5 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 03/02/2021, denying IFP, RECEIVED.[3049098] [21-515] [Entered: 03/04/2021 02:25 PM]
March 2, 2021 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3049092] [21-515] [Entered: 03/04/2021 02:22 PM]
March 2, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, FILED. Service date 02/25/2021 by US mail.[3049081] [21-515] [Entered: 03/04/2021 02:18 PM]
March 2, 2021 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL, dated 02/09/2021, RECEIVED.[3049075] [21-515] [Entered: 03/04/2021 02:15 PM]
March 2, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Royal Daniel Hall, FILED. [3049067] [21-515] [Entered: 03/04/2021 02:07 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Hall v. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Royal Daniel Hall
Represented By: Royal Daniel Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Christopher Miller
Represented By: Barbara D. Underwood
Represented By: Kirsten A. Rappleyea Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?