Michael Cetta, Inc. v. Admiral Indemnity Company
| Admiral Indemnity Company |
| Michael Cetta, Inc., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, DBA Sparks Steak House |
| 21-57 |
| January 11, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 33 LOCAL RULE 34.1 NOTICE, TRANSMITTED.[3051426] LOCAL RULE 31.2 NOTICE, placing this appeal on the Court's Expedited Calendar, setting appellant's brief due date as 04/12/2021, appellee's brief due date as 05/17/2021TRANSMITTED.[3051426] [21-57] [Entered: 03/08/2021 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 32 NEW CASE MANAGER, Wilson Dudley, ASSIGNED.[3051407] [21-57] [Entered: 03/08/2021 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 29 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Michael Cetta, Inc., informing Court of proposed due date 05/19/2021, RECEIVED. Service date 03/03/2021 by CM/ECF.[3048347] [21-57] [Entered: 03/03/2021 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 24 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM C [ # 22 ], [ # 23 ], on behalf of Appellant Michael Cetta, Inc., FILED.[3038918] [21-57] [Entered: 02/18/2021 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 23 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Michael Cetta, Inc., FILED. Service date 02/17/2021 by CM/ECF.[3038335] [21-57] [Entered: 02/17/2021 06:36 PM] |
| Filing 22 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, FORM C, [19], on behalf of Appellant Michael Cetta, Inc., FILED.[3038214] [21-57] [Entered: 02/17/2021 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 21 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Michael Cetta, Inc., FILED. Service date 02/17/2021 by CM/ECF.[3038005] [21-57] [Entered: 02/17/2021 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 20 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Michael Cetta, Inc., FILED. Service date 02/17/2021 by CM/ECF.[3038001] [21-57] [Entered: 02/17/2021 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 19 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Michael Cetta, Inc., FILED. Service date 02/17/2021 by CM/ECF.[3037993] [21-57] [Entered: 02/17/2021 02:02 PM] |
Filing 16
ORDER, dated 02/05/2021, dismissing appeal by 02/19/2021, unless Appellant Michael Cetta, Inc., submits form D, FILED.[3030833] [21-57] [Entered: 02/05/2021 12:43 PM]
|
Filing 15
ORDER, dated 02/05/2021, dismissing appeal by 02/19/2021, unless Appellant Michael Cetta, Inc., submits form C, FILED.[3030824] [21-57] [Entered: 02/05/2021 12:40 PM]
|
Filing 14
ORDER, dated 02/05/2021, dismissing appeal by 02/19/2021, unless Appellant Michael Cetta, Inc., submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, FILED.[3030819] [21-57] [Entered: 02/05/2021 12:36 PM]
|
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Antonia B. Ianniello for Admiral Indemnity Company, in case 21-57, [ # 11 ], ADDED.[3029435] [21-57] [Entered: 02/04/2021 07:56 AM] |
| Filing 12 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL [ # 10 ], [ # 11 ], on behalf of Appellee Admiral Indemnity Company, FILED.[3029433] [21-57] [Entered: 02/04/2021 07:55 AM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Admiral Indemnity Company, FILED. Service date 02/03/2021 by CM/ECF. [3029248] [21-57] [Entered: 02/03/2021 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, [9], on behalf of Appellee Admiral Indemnity Company, FILED.[3020628] [21-57] [Entered: 01/26/2021 07:47 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Admiral Indemnity Company, FILED. Service date 01/25/2021 by CM/ECF. [3020529] [21-57] [Entered: 01/25/2021 06:08 PM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Admiral Indemnity Company, FILED. Service date 01/12/2021 by CM/ECF.[3011849] [21-57] [Entered: 01/12/2021 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 7 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Antonia B. Ianniello, Esq. for Appellee Admiral Indemnity Company, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3011662] [21-57] [Entered: 01/12/2021 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3011661] [21-57] [Entered: 01/12/2021 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Michael Cetta, Inc., district court receipt # ANYSDC-23451552, FILED.[3011658] [21-57] [Entered: 01/12/2021 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/11/2020, RECEIVED.[3011656] [21-57] [Entered: 01/12/2021 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 12/11/2020, RECEIVED.[3011651] [21-57] [Entered: 01/12/2021 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Michael Cetta, Inc., FILED. [3011645] [21-57] [Entered: 01/12/2021 02:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Michael Cetta, Inc. v. Admiral Indemnity Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Admiral Indemnity Company | |
| Represented By: | Antonia B. Ianniello Esq. |
| Represented By: | Wystan M. Ackerman Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Michael Cetta, Inc., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, DBA Sparks Steak House | |
| Represented By: | Stephen A. Weiss Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.