Sanders v. Doe
| Officer Mike Doe, in their individual and official capacities, Officer John Doe, in their individual and official capacities, Sergeant Johnson and Sergeant Shawn Doe, in their individual and official capacities |
| Detective Petar Simonovic and Police Officer Jose Cintron |
| Robert Sanders |
| 21-600 |
| March 12, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [27], on behalf of Appellant Robert Sanders, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3081729] [21-600] [Entered: 04/20/2021 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 27 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Robert Sanders, FILED. Service date 03/28/2021 by US mail.[3081717] [21-600] [Entered: 04/20/2021 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 26 SUPPLEMENTARY PAPERS TO MOTION [ # 20 ], on behalf of Appellant Robert Sanders, FILED. Service date 03/28/2021 by US mail.[3081716][26] [21-600] [Entered: 04/20/2021 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 25 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [21], on behalf of Appellant Robert Sanders, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3081700] [21-600] [Entered: 04/20/2021 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 21 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Robert Sanders, FILED. Service date 03/28/2021 by US mail.[3074094] [21-600] [Entered: 04/09/2021 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Robert Sanders, FILED. Service date 03/28/2021 by US mail.[3074093] [21-600] [Entered: 04/09/2021 09:44 AM] |
Filing 19
ORDER, dated 04/01/2021, dismissing appeal by 04/22/2021, unless Appellant Robert Sanders, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3068425] [21-600] [Entered: 04/01/2021 01:26 PM]
|
| Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Jose Cintron and Petar Simonovic, FILED. Service date 04/01/2021 by US mail.[3068143] [21-600] [Entered: 04/01/2021 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Robert Sanders, FILED. Service date 03/26/2021 by 3rd party.[3066484] [21-600] [Entered: 03/30/2021 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 16 ATTORNEY, Jesse A. Townsend, [ # 14 ], in place of attorney James E. Johnson, SUBSTITUTED.[3063944] [21-600] [Entered: 03/25/2021 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 15 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, [ # 13 ], [ # 14 ], on behalf of Appellees Jose Cintron and Petar Simonovic, FILED.[3063939] [21-600] [Entered: 03/25/2021 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Jose Cintron and Petar Simonovic, FILED. Service date 03/25/2021 by US mail. [3063927] [21-600] [Entered: 03/25/2021 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance for Substitute Counsel, [12], on behalf of Appellees Jose Cintron and Petar Simonovic, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3063893] [21-600] [Entered: 03/25/2021 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Jose Cintron and Petar Simonovic, FILED. Service date 03/25/2021 by US mail. [3063500] [21-600] [Entered: 03/25/2021 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellant, SENT.[3057706] [21-600] [Entered: 03/16/2021 06:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3057693] [21-600] [Entered: 03/16/2021 06:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 02/23/2021, RECEIVED.[3057691] [21-600] [Entered: 03/16/2021 06:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Robert Sanders, FILED. [3057685] [21-600] [Entered: 03/16/2021 06:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
