Singh v. Garland
| PAWANDEEP SINGH |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-6093 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 36 JUDGMENT MANDATE, ISSUED [Entered: 06/09/2023 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 35 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yenni Liu, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 04/18/2023 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 34 SUMMARY ORDER AND JUDGMENT, denying the petition for review, by MHP, SJM, AJN, FILED. [Entered: 04/18/2023 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 33 NAC PETITION, to MHP, SJM, AJN, SUBMITTED. [Entered: 04/17/2023 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 32 NEW CASE MANAGER, Dennisse Pizarro-Lebron, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 06/28/2022 10:09:00 AM] |
| Filing 31 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of Petitioner Pawandeep Singh, FILED. [Entered: 03/02/2022 01:53:00 PM] |
| Filing 30 CURED DEFECTIVE Oral argument statement LR 34.1(a), at entry 29, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 01/20/2022 02:34:00 PM] |
| Filing 29 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 01/19/2022 04:57:00 PM] |
| Filing 28 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Oral argument statement LR34.1(a), at docket entry 27, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 01/19/2022 12:50:00 PM] |
| Filing 27 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 01/19/2022 11:21:00 AM] |
| Filing 26 BRIEF, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 01/18/2022 01:37:00 PM] |
| Filing 25 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Respondent Merrick B. Garland brief and appendix due date as 1/18/2022, FILED. [Entered: 11/10/2021 12:16:00 PM] |
| Filing 24 ATTORNEY, Nehal H. Kamani, on behalf of Respondent Robert M. Wilkinson, Respondent Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 11/01/2021 10:48:00 AM] |
| Filing 23 ATTORNEY, Christin Whitacre in place of attorney Nehal H. Kamani, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 11/01/2021 10:48:00 AM] |
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Christin Whitacre for Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 11/01/2021 09:54:00 AM] |
| Filing 21 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, informing Court of proposed due date 1/18/2022, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/19/2021 10:46:00 AM] |
| Filing 20 BRIEF, on behalf of Petitioner Pawandeep Singh, FILED. [Entered: 10/17/2021 10:15:00 PM] |
| Filing 19 NEW CASE MANAGER, Veronica Balladares, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 10/07/2021 11:31:00 AM] |
| Filing 18 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Petitioner Pawandeep Singh brief due date as 10/18/2021, FILED. [Entered: 08/04/2021 04:27:00 PM] |
| Filing 17 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Petitioner Pawandeep Singh, informing Court of proposed due date 10/18/2021, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/27/2021 09:10:00 PM] |
| Filing 16 TOLLING CANCELLATION ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 07/22/2021 03:07:00 PM] |
| Filing 15 IMMIGRATION 90-DAY TOLLING ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 04/21/2021 12:40:00 PM] |
| Filing 14 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILED [Entered: 03/22/2021 01:34:00 PM] |
| Filing 13 NEW CASE MANAGER, Sarah Jean-Charles, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 03/19/2021 04:30:00 PM] |
| Filing 12 CAPTION, pursuant FRAP 43(c)(2), AMENDED. [Entered: 03/16/2021 12:27:00 PM] |
| Filing 11 Robert M. Wilkinson, Respondent, replaced by Merrick B. Garland, Respondent, per FRAP 43(c)(2), SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 3/15/2021 05:56:31 PM] |
| Filing 10 FORM C/A, on behalf of Petitioner Pawandeep Singh, FILED. [Entered: 03/04/2021 03:14:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Nehal H. Kamani in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 03/02/2021 05:57:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, FILED. [Entered: 02/25/2021 10:36:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Pawandeep Singh, FILED. [Entered: 02/23/2021 11:54:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 02/22/2021 08:06:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Pawandeep Singh, USCA receipt # A02-328-ACMS FILED. [Entered: 02/22/2021 08:04:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Pawandeep Singh, OPENED. [Entered: 02/22/2021 08:03:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 OIL, on behalf of Respondent Robert M. Wilkinson, ADDED. [Entered: 02/22/2021 07:55:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 01/29/2021, RECEIVED. [Entered: 02/21/2021 04:32:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Pawandeep Singh, FILED. [Entered: 02/21/2021 04:30:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Singh v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: PAWANDEEP SINGH | |
| Represented By: | Suraj Raj Singh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Marie Arnold |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Christin Whitacre |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
