Segura v. Griffin
Thomas Griffin |
Carlos Segura |
21-611 |
March 17, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER, dated 04/29/2021, dismissing appeal by 05/20/2021, unless Appellant Carlos Segura, moves for certificate of appealability, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3089972] [21-611] [Entered: 04/29/2021 03:06 PM] |
Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, [14], on behalf of Appellant Carlos Segura, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3083730] [21-611] [Entered: 04/22/2021 11:58 AM] |
Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, [12], on behalf of Appellant Carlos Segura, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3083677] [21-611] [Entered: 04/22/2021 11:40 AM] |
Filing 14 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Carlos Segura, FILED. No service.[3083662] [21-611] [Entered: 04/22/2021 11:36 AM] |
Filing 13 PAPERS, Copy of Appellee's acknowledgment and notice of appearance form, RECEIVED.[3083656] [21-611] [Entered: 04/22/2021 11:35 AM] |
Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Carlos Segura, FILED. No service.[3083650] [21-611] [Entered: 04/22/2021 11:33 AM] |
Filing 11 PAPERS, Copy of petition for writ of habeas filed in the district court, certificate of service and letter from pro se, RECEIVED.[3083646] [21-611] [Entered: 04/22/2021 11:32 AM] |
Filing 9 ORDER, dated 04/12/2021, dismissing appeal by 05/03/2021, unless Appellant Carlos Segura, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3074997] [21-611] [Entered: 04/12/2021 08:29 AM] |
Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Thomas Griffin, FILED. Service date 03/29/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3065542] [21-611] [Entered: 03/29/2021 12:58 PM] |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Barbara D. Underwood, for Appellee Thomas Griffin, TERMINATED.[3063813] [21-611] [Entered: 03/25/2021 02:02 PM] |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Thomas Griffin, FILED. Service date 03/24/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3063155] [21-611] [Entered: 03/24/2021 04:31 PM] |
Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3059325] [21-611] [Entered: 03/18/2021 01:18 PM] |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3059324] [21-611] [Entered: 03/18/2021 01:15 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 01/26/2021, RECEIVED.[3059323] [21-611] [Entered: 03/18/2021 01:14 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Carlos Segura, FILED. [3059318] [21-611] [Entered: 03/18/2021 01:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Segura v. Griffin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Thomas Griffin | |
Represented By: | Cristin Connell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Carlos Segura | |
Represented By: | Carlos Segura |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.