Samuels v. Garland
| WAYNE FREDERICK SAMUELS |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-6297 |
| May 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 01/19/2022, determining the appeal to OIL, copy to pro se, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 03/29/2022 10:35:00 AM] |
| Filing 29 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to dismiss, at docket entry 22 and 23, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, denying as moot for assignment of pro bono counsel, at docket entry 7, on behalf of Petitioner Wayne Frederick Samuels, denying as moot motion for in forma pauperis at docket entry 6, on behalf of Petitioner Wayne Frederick Samuels, and denying as moot motion for stay of removal at docket entry 5, on behalf of Petitioner Wayne Frederick Samuels, by ALK, JMW, RJS, copy to pro se, FILED. [Entered: 01/19/2022 04:28:00 PM] |
| Filing 28 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yana Segal, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 01/19/2022 03:54:00 PM] |
| Filing 27 TOLLING CANCELLATION ORDER, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 09/30/2021 02:57:00 PM] |
| Filing 26 REPLY TO OPPOSITION, to motion to dismiss and stay of removal, on behalf of Petitioner Wayne Frederick Samuels, FILED. [Entered: 08/05/2021 12:51:00 PM] |
| Filing 25 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION TO DISMISS, at entry 23, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 07/26/2021 12:42:00 PM] |
| Filing 24 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to dismiss, at docket entry 22, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 07/26/2021 12:40:00 PM] |
| Filing 23 OPPOSITION, motion for stay of removal, on behalf Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 07/23/2021 04:16:00 PM] |
| Filing 22 MOTION, to dismiss, on behalf Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 07/23/2021 04:12:00 PM] |
| Filing 21 IMMIGRATION 90-DAY TOLLING ORDER, copy to pro se Petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 06/21/2021 06:07:00 PM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to file Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form out of time, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 06/14/2021 03:22:00 PM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION, to file late, on behalf of Petitioner Wayne Frederick Samuels, FILED. [Entered: 06/11/2021 04:39:00 PM] |
| Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Wayne Frederick Samuels, FILED. [Entered: 06/11/2021 04:28:00 PM] |
| Filing 17 Motion, for stay of removal, on behalf of Petitioner Wayne Frederick Samuels, FILED. [Entered: 06/08/2021 05:10:00 PM] |
| Filing 16 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILED [Entered: 06/07/2021 10:03:00 AM] |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 05/20/2021 09:55:00 AM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, James A. Hurley in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 05/20/2021 09:54:00 AM] |
| Filing 13 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL [12], on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 05/20/2021 09:52:00 AM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of James A. Hurley for Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 05/20/2021 09:43:00 AM] |
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel/Additional Counsel, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 05/20/2021 09:32:00 AM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of James A. Hurley for Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 05/20/2021 09:16:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 05/20/2021 08:05:00 AM] |
| Filing 8 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 05/19/2021 05:22:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION, for assignment of pro bono counsel, on behalf of Petitioner Wayne Frederick Samuels, FILED. [Entered: 05/19/2021 05:17:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Petitioner Wayne Frederick Samuels, FILED. [Entered: 05/19/2021 05:15:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Motion, for stay of removal, on behalf of Petitioner Wayne Frederick Samuels, FILED. [Entered: 05/19/2021 05:12:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Wayne Frederick Samuels, OPENED. [Entered: 05/19/2021 05:00:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 OIL for Respondent Merrick B. Garland , ADDED.[Entered: 05/19/2021 04:54:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 5/10/2021, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/19/2021 04:20:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Wayne Frederick Samuels, FILED. [Entered: 05/19/2021 04:19:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Samuels v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: WAYNE FREDERICK SAMUELS | |
| Represented By: | Wayne Frederick Samuels |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | James A. Hurley |
| Represented By: | Oil Oil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
