Singh-Kaur v. Garland
| VIKRAMJEET SINGH-KAUR |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-6328 |
| June 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 48 JUDGMENT MANDATE, ISSUED [Entered: 08/28/2023 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 47 ATTORNEY, Jatinder Singh Grewal in place of attorney Anas J. Ahmed, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 08/11/2023 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 46 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, FILED. [Entered: 08/10/2023 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 45 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yenni Liu, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 07/07/2023 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 44 CERTIFIED ORDER, dated 07/07/2023, to OIL, ISSUED. [Entered: 07/07/2023 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 43 SUMMARY ORDER AND JUDGMENT, granting the petition for review, and remanding the case for reconsideration in light of this order, by DAL, JON, BR, FILED. [Entered: 07/07/2023 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 42 NAC PETITION, to DAL, JON, BR, SUBMITTED. [Entered: 05/30/2023 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 41 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance for Attorney prior to case assignment, at docket entry 40, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 10/24/2022 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 40 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Marie Vanderbilt Robinson for Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 10/20/2022 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 39 CURED DEFECTIVE Respondent Brief FILED, at entry 38, on behalf of filer Counsel for Respondent Sarai Aldana, Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/23/2022 09:13:00 AM] |
| Filing 38 BRIEF, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 03:29:00 PM] |
| Filing 37 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Respondent Brief FILED, at docket entry 36, on behalf of Counsel for Respondent Sarai Aldana, Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 01:07:00 PM] |
| Filing 36 BRIEF, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/18/2022 10:57:00 AM] |
| Filing 35 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Respondent Brief FILED, at docket entry 34, on behalf of Counsel for Respondent Sarai Aldana, Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/17/2022 10:09:00 PM] |
| Filing 34 BRIEF, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/16/2022 10:56:00 AM] |
| Filing 33 ATTORNEY, Sunah Lee, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 01/11/2022 03:29:00 PM] |
| Filing 32 ATTORNEY, Sarai Aldana in place of attorney Sunah Lee, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 01/11/2022 03:25:00 PM] |
| Filing 31 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Sarai Aldana for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 01/11/2022 10:35:00 AM] |
| Filing 30 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Respondent brief due 3/16/2022, FILED. [Entered: 12/17/2021 11:58:00 AM] |
| Filing 29 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, informing Court of proposed due date 3/16/2022 , RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/16/2021 11:50:00 AM] |
| Filing 28 BRIEF & SPECIAL APPENDIX, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, FILED. [Entered: 12/15/2021 12:59:00 PM] |
| Filing 27 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Petitioner's Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur brief due January 4, 2022, FILED. [Entered: 11/05/2021 08:32:00 AM] |
| Filing 26 AMENDED TOLLING CANCELLATION ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 10/28/2021 12:53:00 PM] |
| Filing 25 CURED DEFECTIVE LR 31.2 scheduling notification, at entry 24, on behalf of filer Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, FILED. [Entered: 10/22/2021 09:07:00 AM] |
| Filing 24 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, informing Court of proposed due date 1/4/2022, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/18/2021 01:11:00 PM] |
| Filing 23 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Immigration 90-day tolling cancellation letter, at docket entry 21, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, FILED. [Entered: 10/15/2021 03:50:00 PM] |
| Filing 22 TOLLING CANCELLATION ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 10/13/2021 04:53:00 PM] |
| Filing 21 IMMIGRATION TOLLING CANCELLATION LETTER, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, FILED. [Entered: 10/12/2021 12:39:00 PM] |
| Filing 20 IMMIGRATION TOLLING CANCELLATION LETTER, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 10/07/2021 07:33:00 AM] |
| Filing 19 IMMIGRATION 90-DAY TOLLING ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 07/08/2021 12:22:00 PM] |
| Filing 18 NEW CASE MANAGER, Tynetta Wilder, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 07/06/2021 02:12:00 PM] |
| Filing 17 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM C/A, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, FILED. [Entered: 06/24/2021 10:44:00 AM] |
| Filing 16 FORM C/A, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, FILED. [Entered: 06/23/2021 12:11:00 PM] |
| Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C/A, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, FILED. [Entered: 06/23/2021 10:41:00 AM] |
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C/A, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, FILED. [Entered: 06/23/2021 10:39:00 AM] |
| Filing 13 ADDENDUM, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, FILED. Service By ACMS. [Entered: 06/22/2021 04:28:00 PM] |
| Filing 12 FORM C/A, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, FILED. [Entered: 06/22/2021 04:25:00 PM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, FILED. [Entered: 06/22/2021 04:23:00 PM] |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILED [Entered: 06/21/2021 04:00:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland Respondent, TERMINATED. [Entered: 06/08/2021 11:24:00 AM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Sunah Lee, in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 06/08/2021 11:23:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Sunah Lee for Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 06/04/2021 04:05:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 06/04/2021 12:44:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, USCA receipt # A02-538-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 06/04/2021 12:41:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, received on 06/03/2021, OPENED. [Entered: 06/04/2021 12:40:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 OIL, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, ADDED.[Entered: 06/04/2021 12:35:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 5/17/2021, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/03/2021 01:49:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Vikramjeet Singh-Kaur, FILED. [Entered: 06/03/2021 01:48:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Singh-Kaur v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: VIKRAMJEET SINGH-KAUR | |
| Represented By: | Jatinder Singh Grewal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Sarai Aldana |
| Represented By: | Oil Oil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
