Ramos-Vigil v. Garland
| KARINA VANESSA RAMOS-VIGIL |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-6428 |
| August 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 31 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 03/23/2022, determining the appeal to OIL, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 03/23/2022 11:07:00 AM] |
| Filing 30 FRAP 42(b) IMMIGRATION REMAND ORDER, remanding case to BIA, pursuant to this Court's October 16, 2012 opinion, FILED. [Entered: 03/23/2022 11:04:00 AM] |
| Filing 29 NEW CASE MANAGER, Atasha Joseph, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 03/23/2022 11:00:00 AM] |
| Filing 28 CURED DEFECTIVE motion for FRAP 42(b) immigration remand, at entry 27, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 03:36:00 PM] |
| Filing 27 MOTION, for FRAP 42(b) immigration remand, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 02:20:00 PM] |
| Filing 26 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion for FRAP 42(b) immigration remand, at docket entry 25, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 02:15:00 PM] |
| Filing 25 MOTION, for FRAP 42(b) immigration remand, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 01:59:00 PM] |
| Filing 24 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, FRAP 42(b) stipulation with prejudice, at docket entry 23, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 01:23:00 PM] |
| Filing 23 FRAP 42 STIPULATION, With Prejudice, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 12:04:00 PM] |
| Filing 22 MOTION ORDER, granting motion for extension of time, at docket entry 21, on behalf of Petitioner Karina Vanessa Ramos-Vigil. Petitioner has until March 30, 2022 to file the brief, by JON, FILED. [Entered: 02/28/2022 04:26:00 PM] |
| Filing 21 MOTION, for extension of time, on behalf of Petitioner Karina Vanessa Ramos-Vigil, FILED. [Entered: 02/25/2022 04:52:00 PM] |
| Filing 20 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Petitioner Karina Vanessa Ramos-Vigil brief and appendix due date as 2/28/2022, FILED. [Entered: 12/21/2021 03:58:00 PM] |
| Filing 19 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Petitioner Karina Vanessa Ramos-Vigil, informing Court of proposed due date 2/28/2022, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/13/2021 04:56:00 PM] |
| Filing 18 TOLLING CANCELLATION ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 11/30/2021 03:40:00 PM] |
| Filing 17 IMMIGRATION 90-DAY TOLLING ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 08/31/2021 06:12:00 PM] |
| Filing 16 NEW CASE MANAGER, Veronica Balladares, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 08/31/2021 05:55:00 PM] |
| Filing 15 CURED DEFECTIVE Form C-A, at entry 13, on behalf of filer Petitioner Karina Vanessa Ramos-Vigil, FILED. [Entered: 08/30/2021 09:43:00 AM] |
| Filing 14 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILED [Entered: 08/30/2021 07:15:00 AM] |
| Filing 13 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Karina Vanessa Ramos-Vigil, FILED. [Entered: 08/27/2021 09:05:00 PM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C-A, at docket entry [11], on behalf of Petitioner Karina Vanessa Ramos-Vigil, FILED. [Entered: 08/25/2021 08:47:00 AM] |
| Filing 11 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Karina Vanessa Ramos-Vigil, FILED. [Entered: 08/23/2021 09:06:00 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Karina Vanessa Ramos-Vigil, FILED. [Entered: 08/23/2021 08:56:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland Respondent, TERMINATED. [Entered: 08/16/2021 11:14:00 AM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Timothy Bo Stanton in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 08/16/2021 11:14:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Timothy Bo Stanton for Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 08/13/2021 01:05:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 OIL , on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, ADDED. [Entered: 08/10/2021 04:42:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 08/09/2021 11:07:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Karina Vanessa Ramos-Vigil, USCA receipt # A02-625-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 08/09/2021 11:04:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Karina Vanessa Ramos-Vigil, received on 08/06/2021, OPENED. [Entered: 08/09/2021 11:03:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 7/7/2021, RECEIVED. [Entered: 08/06/2021 03:05:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Karina Vanessa Ramos-Vigil, FILED. [Entered: 08/06/2021 02:36:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ramos-Vigil v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: KARINA VANESSA RAMOS-VIGIL | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Meehan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Timothy Bo Stanton |
| Represented By: | Lisa Marie Arnold |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
