Paulk v. Commissioner of Social Securit
Commissioner of Social Security |
Raydard Vashawn Paulk, Jr. |
21-897 |
April 7, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, LR 31.2 Scheduling Notification, [16], on behalf of Appellant Raydard Vashawn Paulk, Jr., copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3108451] [21-897] [Entered: 05/26/2021 12:07 PM] |
Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [15], on behalf of Appellant Raydard Vashawn Paulk, Jr., copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3108430] [21-897] [Entered: 05/26/2021 11:59 AM] |
Filing 16 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Raydard Vashawn Paulk, Jr., informing Court of proposed due date 05/19/2021, RECEIVED. No service date.[3108421] [21-897] [Entered: 05/26/2021 11:53 AM] |
Filing 15 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Raydard Vashawn Paulk, Jr., FILED. Service date 05/19/2021 by US mail.[3108419] [21-897] [Entered: 05/26/2021 11:52 AM] |
Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [12], on behalf of Appellant Raydard Vashawn Paulk, Jr., copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3097987] [21-897] [Entered: 05/11/2021 12:33 PM] |
Filing 12 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Raydard Vashawn Paulk, Jr., FILED. Service date 05/04/2021 by US mail.[3097979] [21-897] [Entered: 05/11/2021 12:26 PM] |
Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Raydard Vashawn Paulk, Jr., FILED. Service date 05/04/2021 by US mail.[3097977] [21-897] [Entered: 05/11/2021 12:25 PM] |
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Social Security, FILED. Service date 04/30/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3090316] [21-897] [Entered: 04/30/2021 09:05 AM] |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Michael P. Corona, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney Tiffany H. Lee, SUBSTITUTED.[3089883] [21-897] [Entered: 04/29/2021 02:16 PM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Social Security, FILED. Service date 04/29/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3089874] [21-897] [Entered: 04/29/2021 02:10 PM] |
Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellant, SENT.[3074363] [21-897] [Entered: 04/09/2021 01:21 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 04/09/2021, granting IFP, RECEIVED.[3074362] [21-897] [Entered: 04/09/2021 01:20 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/24/2021, RECEIVED.[3074359] [21-897] [Entered: 04/09/2021 01:18 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Raydard Vashawn Paulk, Jr., FILED. [3074354] [21-897] [Entered: 04/09/2021 01:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Paulk v. Commissioner of Social Securit | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Tiffany H. Lee |
Represented By: | Michael Corona |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Raydard Vashawn Paulk, Jr. | |
Represented By: | Raydard Vashawn Paulk Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.