Airday v. The City of New York
| George Airday |
| Estate of George Airday |
| The City of New York, Keith Schwam and David M. Frankel |
| 22-1081 |
| May 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 40 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Estate of George Airday Brief due date as 10/05/2022. Joint Appendix due date as 10/05/2022, FILED.[3346347] [22-1081] [Entered: 07/12/2022 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 37 NOTICE, to Appellee David M. Frankel, Keith Schwam and The City of New York, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3346159] [22-1081] [Entered: 07/12/2022 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 36 NEW CASE MANAGER, Evelyn Cruz, ASSIGNED.[3346148] [22-1081] [Entered: 07/12/2022 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 33 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, informing Court of proposed due date 10/05/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 07/08/2022 by CM/ECF.[3345070] [22-1081] [Entered: 07/08/2022 07:13 PM] |
| Filing 32 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 07/06/2022, on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 07/06/2022 by CM/ECF.[3343080] [22-1081] [Entered: 07/06/2022 08:59 PM] |
| Filing 31 CAMP ORDER, Type of Conference: Telephonic, Scheduled Date of Conference: 07/19/2022, Start Time: 10:30 AM, Required Attendees: Clients with Counsel, with Dean W.M. Leslie, ENTERED.[3325650] [22-1081] [Entered: 06/02/2022 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 28 CURED DEFECTIVE Form C [ # 19 ], [ # 26 ], [ # 27 ], on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED.[3324613] [22-1081] [Entered: 06/01/2022 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 27 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED. Service date 06/01/2022 by CM/ECF.[3324257] [22-1081] [Entered: 06/01/2022 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 26 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C, [22], on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED.[3323697] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/31/2022 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 25 CURED DEFECTIVE Form D [ # 20 ], [ # 23 ], on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED.[3323692] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/31/2022 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 24 CURED DEFECTIVE Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form [ # 18 ], [ # 21 ], on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED.[3323691] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/31/2022 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 23 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED. Service date 05/31/2022 by CM/ECF.[3323601] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/31/2022 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 22 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED. Service date 05/31/2022 by CM/ECF.[3323599] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/31/2022 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 21 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED. Service date 05/31/2022 by CM/ECF.[3323597] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/31/2022 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 20 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D, [17], on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED.[3323235] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/31/2022 08:15 AM] |
| Filing 19 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C, [16], on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED.[3323234] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/31/2022 08:08 AM] |
| Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form [15], on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED.[3323233] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/31/2022 07:47 AM] |
| Filing 17 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED. Service date 05/27/2022 by CM/ECF.[3323124] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/27/2022 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 16 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED. Service date 05/27/2022 by CM/ECF.[3323123] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/27/2022 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED. Service date 05/27/2022 by CM/ECF.[3323119] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/27/2022 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, MacKenzie Fillow for The City of New York David M. Frankel Keith Schwam, in case 22-1081 , [ # 13 ], ADDED.[3319564] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/23/2022 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee David M. Frankel, Keith Schwam and The City of New York, FILED. Service date 05/23/2022 by CM/ECF. [3319511] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/23/2022 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3315749] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/16/2022 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 9 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, district court receipt # ANYSDC-26145001, FILED.[3315747] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/16/2022 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 8 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 04/28/2022, RECEIVED.[3315739] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/16/2022 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, dated 04/28/2022, RECEIVED.[3315737] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/16/2022 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 6 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 05/21/2021, RECEIVED.[3315729] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/16/2022 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 05/21/2021, RECEIVED.[3315727] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/16/2022 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT MEMO ENDORSED, dated 10/10/2019, RECEIVED.[3315725] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/16/2022 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 09/13/2019, RECEIVED.[3315717] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/16/2022 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 04/10/2019, RECEIVED.[3315700] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/16/2022 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Estate of George Airday, FILED. [3315692] [22-1081] [Entered: 05/16/2022 02:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
