Rushing v. State of Michigan
| Shaun Rushing |
| State of Michigan |
| 22-1111 |
| May 20, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [ # 7 ], [ # 15 ], [ # 20 ], on behalf of Appellant Shaun Rushing, FILED.[3336157] [22-1111] [Entered: 06/22/2022 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Shaun Rushing, FILED. Service date 06/16/2022 by hand delivery.[3336154] [22-1111] [Entered: 06/22/2022 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 18 UNDELIVERABLE MAIL, return to sender, not at this address from 90 Laffayette, for Shaun Rushing, to USCA from USPS, RECEIVED.[3332394] [22-1111] [Entered: 06/14/2022 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE, to Appellee State of Michigan, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3328662] [22-1111] [Entered: 06/08/2022 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [12], on behalf of Appellant Shaun Rushing, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3328607] [22-1111] [Entered: 06/08/2022 09:20 AM] |
Filing 14
ORDER, dated 06/08/2022, dismissing appeal by 06/29/2022, unless appellant Shaun Rushing, submits form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3328577] [22-1111] [Entered: 06/08/2022 09:05 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER, dated 06/08/2022, dismissing appeal by 06/29/2022, unless appellant Shaun Rushing, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3328547] [22-1111] [Entered: 06/08/2022 08:47 AM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Shaun Rushing, FILED. Service date 06/06/2022 by US mail.[3328527] [22-1111] [Entered: 06/08/2022 08:33 AM] |
| Filing 9 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3319556] [22-1111] [Entered: 05/23/2022 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 7 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [ # 5 ], on behalf of Appellant Shaun Rushing, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3319539] [22-1111] [Entered: 05/23/2022 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3319534] [22-1111] [Entered: 05/23/2022 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Shaun Rushing, FILED. No service.[3319532] [22-1111] [Entered: 05/23/2022 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 04/28/2022, RECEIVED.[3319526] [22-1111] [Entered: 05/23/2022 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 04/28/2022, RECEIVED.[3319524] [22-1111] [Entered: 05/23/2022 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Shaun Rushing, FILED. [3319509] [22-1111] [Entered: 05/23/2022 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rushing v. State of Michigan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Shaun Rushing | |
| Represented By: | Shaun Rushing |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: State of Michigan | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Morrisseau Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
