(HC) Jones v. Caputo
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr. |
Joseph Caputo |
22-1130 |
May 20, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
Filing 20 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Rafael Arden Jones, Sr., Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form and Form D-P, [10], [12], [13], from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3344110] [22-1130] [Entered: 07/07/2022 05:16 PM] |
Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [13], on behalf of Appellant Rafael Arden Jones, Sr., copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3330263] [22-1130] [Entered: 06/10/2022 09:37 AM] |
Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, [12], on behalf of Appellant Rafael Arden Jones, Sr., copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3330251] [22-1130] [Entered: 06/10/2022 09:29 AM] |
Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [10], on behalf of Appellant Rafael Arden Jones, Sr., copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3330236] [22-1130] [Entered: 06/10/2022 09:23 AM] |
Filing 13 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Rafael Arden Jones, Sr., FILED. Service date 05/31/2022 by US mail.[3330235] [22-1130] [Entered: 06/10/2022 09:22 AM] |
Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Rafael Arden Jones, Sr., FILED. Service date 05/31/2022 by US mail.[3330231] [22-1130] [Entered: 06/10/2022 09:21 AM] |
Filing 10 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Rafael Arden Jones, Sr., FILED. Service date 05/31/2022 by US mail.[3330223] [22-1130] [Entered: 06/10/2022 09:18 AM] |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY, David M. Cohn, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[3321341] [22-1130] [Entered: 05/25/2022 02:48 PM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Joseph Caputo, FILED. Service date 05/25/2022 by CM/ECF. [3321339] [22-1130] [Entered: 05/25/2022 02:45 PM] |
Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3320508] [22-1130] [Entered: 05/24/2022 01:29 PM] |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3320505] [22-1130] [Entered: 05/24/2022 01:27 PM] |
Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 04/27/2022, RECEIVED.[3320504] [22-1130] [Entered: 05/24/2022 01:26 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 04/04/2022, RECEIVED.[3320503] [22-1130] [Entered: 05/24/2022 01:25 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL, dated 04/04/2022, RECEIVED.[3320502] [22-1130] [Entered: 05/24/2022 01:25 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Rafael Arden Jones, Sr., FILED. [3320500] [22-1130] [Entered: 05/24/2022 01:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: (HC) Jones v. Caputo | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Rafael Arden Jones, Sr. | |
Represented By: | Rafael Arden Jones Sr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Joseph Caputo | |
Represented By: | David M. Cohn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.