Donoghue v. Tannenbaum
Defendant: Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: Deborah Donoghue and Mark Rubenstein
Defendant / Appellee: Leonard M. Tannenbaum
Case Number: 22-1156
Filed: May 25, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: STATUTES-Secur Comm Exchange
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2022 Filing 30 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Deborah Donoghue and Mark Rubenstein Brief due date as 09/06/2022. Joint Appendix due date as 09/06/2022, FILED.[3337903] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/24/2022 02:52 PM]
June 24, 2022 Filing 27 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Deborah Donoghue and Mark Rubenstein, informing Court of proposed due date 09/06/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 06/24/2022 by CM/ECF.[3337733] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/24/2022 11:40 AM]
June 13, 2022 Filing 25 NEW CASE MANAGER, Ronald Willoughby, ASSIGNED.[3331811] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/13/2022 04:21 PM]
June 13, 2022 Filing 22 CURED DEFECTIVE Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [ # 21 ], on behalf of Appellee Leonard M. Tannenbaum, FILED.[3331798] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/13/2022 04:14 PM]
June 13, 2022 Filing 21 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Leonard M. Tannenbaum, FILED. Service date 06/13/2022 by CM/ECF.[3331774] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/13/2022 03:56 PM]
June 13, 2022 Filing 20 CAPTION, changed designation for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation to reflect district court docket, AMENDED.[3331746] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/13/2022 03:35 PM]
June 13, 2022 Filing 19 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [18], on behalf of Appellee Leonard M. Tannenbaum, FILED.[3331737] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/13/2022 03:28 PM]
June 13, 2022 Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Leonard M. Tannenbaum, FILED. Service date 06/13/2022 by CM/ECF.[3331699] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/13/2022 02:56 PM]
June 9, 2022 Filing 15 ATTORNEY, David Lopez for Deborah Donoghue Mark Rubenstein, in case 22-1156, [ # 11 ], ADDED.[3330048] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/09/2022 04:44 PM]
June 9, 2022 Filing 14 ATTORNEY, James Austen Hunter for Deborah Donoghue Mark Rubenstein, in case 22-1156,[ # 9 ], ADDED.[3330042] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/09/2022 04:40 PM]
June 7, 2022 Filing 13 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Deborah Donoghue and Mark Rubenstein, FILED. Service date 06/07/2022 by CM/ECF.[3328513] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/07/2022 11:26 PM]
June 7, 2022 Filing 12 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Deborah Donoghue and Mark Rubenstein, FILED. Service date 06/07/2022 by CM/ECF.[3328512] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/07/2022 11:25 PM]
June 7, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Mark Rubenstein and Deborah Donoghue, FILED. Service date 06/07/2022 by CM/ECF. [3328084] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/07/2022 12:22 PM]
June 7, 2022 Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Deborah Donoghue and Mark Rubenstein, FILED. Service date 06/07/2022 by CM/ECF.[3328075] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/07/2022 12:15 PM]
June 5, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Deborah Donoghue and Mark Rubenstein, FILED. Service date 06/05/2022 by CM/ECF. [3326917] [22-1156] [Entered: 06/05/2022 04:13 AM]
May 25, 2022 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3322247] [22-1156] [Entered: 05/26/2022 02:43 PM]
May 25, 2022 Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Deborah Donoghue and Mark Rubenstein, district court receipt # ANYSDC-26193478, FILED.[3322241] [22-1156] [Entered: 05/26/2022 02:40 PM]
May 25, 2022 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 04/26/2022, RECEIVED.[3322239] [22-1156] [Entered: 05/26/2022 02:39 PM]
May 25, 2022 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 04/25/2022, RECEIVED.[3322238] [22-1156] [Entered: 05/26/2022 02:38 PM]
May 25, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Deborah Donoghue and Mark Rubenstein, FILED. [3322232] [22-1156] [Entered: 05/26/2022 02:33 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Donoghue v. Tannenbaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Deborah Donoghue
Represented By: Miriam Tauber Esq.
Represented By: James Austen Hunter
Represented By: David Lopez Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Mark Rubenstein
Represented By: Miriam Tauber Esq.
Represented By: James Austen Hunter
Represented By: David Lopez Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Leonard M. Tannenbaum
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Udell Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?