Ervine v. Smith
Petitioner / Appellant: Moses Ervine
Respondent / Appellee: Joseph T. Smith
Case Number: 22-1165
Filed: May 27, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2022 Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion for certificate of Appealability, [12], on behalf of Appellant Moses Ervine, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3350161] [22-1165] [Entered: 07/19/2022 01:17 PM]
July 19, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Moses Ervine, FILED. Service date 07/10/2022 by US mail.[3350160] [22-1165] [Entered: 07/19/2022 01:16 PM]
July 19, 2022 Filing 11 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Moses Ervine, FILED. Service date 07/10/2022 by US mail.[3350157] [22-1165] [Entered: 07/19/2022 01:15 PM]
July 19, 2022 Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Moses Ervine, FILED. Service date 07/10/2022 by US mail.[3350155] [22-1165] [Entered: 07/19/2022 01:14 PM]
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER, dated 06/27/2022, dismissing appeal by 07/18/2022 unless, Appellant Moses Ervine, submits fee or moves to proceed in forma pauperis, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3338496] [22-1165] [Entered: 06/27/2022 12:50 PM]
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER, dated 06/27/2022, dismissing appeal by 07/18/2022, unless Appellant Moses Ervine, submits Form D-P, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3338483] [22-1165] [Entered: 06/27/2022 12:38 PM]
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER, dated 06/27/2022, dismissing appeal by 07/18/2022, unless Appellant Moses Ervine, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3338434] [22-1165] [Entered: 06/27/2022 11:55 AM]
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER, dated 06/24/2022, dismissing appeal by 07/18/2022, unless Appellant Moses Ervine, submits moves for certificate of appealability, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3338423] [22-1165] [Entered: 06/27/2022 11:50 AM]
May 27, 2022 Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3323040] [22-1165] [Entered: 05/27/2022 02:29 PM]
May 27, 2022 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3323039] [22-1165] [Entered: 05/27/2022 02:27 PM]
May 27, 2022 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 04/21/2022, RECEIVED.[3323038] [22-1165] [Entered: 05/27/2022 02:27 PM]
May 27, 2022 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 04/12/2022, RECEIVED.[3323037] [22-1165] [Entered: 05/27/2022 02:26 PM]
May 27, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Moses Ervine, FILED. [3323026] [22-1165] [Entered: 05/27/2022 02:22 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ervine v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Moses Ervine
Represented By: Moses Ervine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Joseph T. Smith
Represented By: Nancy Darragh Killian Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?