Bradshaw v. Uhler

Bradshaw v. Uhler

Plaintiff / Appellant:	Jay Bradshaw
Defendant / Appellee:	Superintendent Donald Uhler, Upstate Correctional Facility, Deputy Superintendent of Security Reginald Bishop, Upstate Correctional Facility, Correctional Lieutenant Gary Gettmann, Upstate Correctional Facility, Correctional Sergeant Eric E. Marshall, Upstate Correctional Facility, Correctional Officer Matthew Chase, Upstate Correctional Facility, Correctional Officer Menard, Upstate Correctional Facility, Correctional Officer Petterson, Upstate Correctional Facility and Correctional Officer John Doe, Upstate Correctional Facility
Case Number:	22-1381
Filed:	June 28, 2022
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit:	PRISONER PET-Civil Rights

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
August 24, 2022	Filing 22 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3371253] [22-1381] [Entered: 08/25/2022 08:42 AM]
August 18, 2022	Filing 20 CERTIFIED PRISONER LITIGATION AUTHORIZATION FORM, dated 08/18/2022, to Upstate Correctional Facility In Care of Warden, ISSUED.[3367579] [22-1381] [Entered: 08/18/2022 02:56 PM]
August 17, 2022	Filing 18 PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT AUTHORIZATION FORM, FILED. Service date 08/17/2022 by US mail.[3367547] [22-1381] [Entered: 08/18/2022 02:35 PM]
August 17, 2022	Filing 17 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Jay Bradshaw, informing Court of proposed due date 09/22/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 08/17/2022 by US mail.[3367544] [22-1381] [Entered: 08/18/2022 02:34 PM]
August 17, 2022	Filing 16 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Jay Bradshaw, FILED. Service date 08/17/2022 by US mail.[3367540] [22-1381] [Entered: 08/18/2022 02:33 PM]
August 16, 2022	Filing 15 ORDER, dated 08/16/2022, stating this appeal may be subject to dismissal by 09/06/2022, unless Appellant Jay Bradshaw, submits a Signed Prisoner Authorization form, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3366040] [22-1381] [Entered: 08/16/2022 11:58 AM]
July 28, 2022	Filing 13 LETTER, dated 07/24/2022, on behalf of Appellant Jay Bradshaw, Appellant writes in response to the letter dated 07/14/2022 by the Appellee, RECEIVED. Service date 07/24/2022 by US mail.[3356357] [22-1381] [Entered: 07/29/2022 08:33 AM]
July 19, 2022	Filing 12 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Jay Bradshaw, FILED. Service date 07/12/2022 by US mail.[3350944] [22-1381] [Entered: 07/20/2022 12:14 PM]
July 19, 2022	Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Jay Bradshaw, FILED. Service date 07/12/2022 by US mail.[3350943] [22-1381] [Entered: 07/20/2022 12:13 PM]
July 15, 2022	Filing 10 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee Reginald Bishop, Matthew Chase, John Doe, Gary Gettmann, Eric E. Marshall, Menard, Petterson and Donald Uhler, write to advise the Court that the New York State Attorney Generals Office does not currently represent the state defendants, and thus cannot appear as counsel or file an appellees brief. RECEIVED. Service date 07/14/2022 by US mail.[3348941] [22-1381] [Entered: 07/15/2022 04:12 PM]
June 29, 2022	Filing 6 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[3340173] [22-1381] [Entered: 06/29/2022 01:59 PM]
June 29, 2022	Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3340169] [22-1381] [Entered: 06/29/2022 01:55 PM]
June 28, 2022	Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3340165] [22-1381] [Entered: 06/29/2022 01:52 PM]
June 28, 2022	Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER entered in the district court as docket entry dated 06/22/2022, RECEIVED.[3340163] [22-1381] [Entered: 06/29/2022 01:51 PM]
June 28, 2022	Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION AND ORDER, dated 06/15/2022, RECEIVED.[3340158] [22-1381] [Entered: 06/29/2022 01:48 PM]
June 28, 2022	Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jay Bradshaw, FILED. [3340154] [22-1381] [Entered: 06/29/2022 01:40 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bradshaw v. Uhler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Jay Bradshaw
Represented By:	Jay Bradshaw
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Superintendent Donald Uhler, Upstate Correctional Facility
Represented By:	Barbara D. Underwood
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Deputy Superintendent of Security Reginald Bishop, Upstate Correctional Facility
Represented By:	Barbara D. Underwood
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Correctional Lieutenant Gary Gettmann, Upstate Correctional Facility
Represented By:	Barbara D. Underwood
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Correctional Sergeant Eric E. Marshall, Upstate Correctional Facility
Represented By:	Barbara D. Underwood
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Correctional Officer Matthew Chase, Upstate Correctional Facility
Represented By:	Barbara D. Underwood
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Correctional Officer Menard, Upstate Correctional Facility
Represented By:	Barbara D. Underwood
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Correctional Officer Petterson, Upstate Correctional Facility
Represented By:	Barbara D. Underwood
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Correctional Officer John Doe, Upstate Correctional Facility
Represented By:	Barbara D. Underwood
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?