Acosta v. United States of America
| Gabriel Acosta |
| United States of America |
| 22-1433 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| TORTS PERSONAL PROPERTY-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 UNDELIVERABLE MAIL, to USCA from USPS, RECEIVED.[3366301] [22-1433] [Entered: 08/16/2022 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 15 UNDELIVERABLE MAIL, to USCA from USPS, for appellant Gabriel Acosta, RECEIVED.[3359882] [22-1433] [Entered: 08/04/2022 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 14 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL [ # 13 ], [ # 11 ], on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED.[3357087] [22-1433] [Entered: 07/29/2022 05:21 PM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT,NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, [9], on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED.[3357083] [22-1433] [Entered: 07/29/2022 05:16 PM] |
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 07/29/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3356710] [22-1433] [Entered: 07/29/2022 01:03 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 07/28/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3356706] [22-1433] [Entered: 07/29/2022 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Hiral Deepak Mehta, [9], in place of attorney Varuni Nelson, SUBSTITUTED.[3355974] [22-1433] [Entered: 07/28/2022 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 07/28/2022 by CM/ECF. [3355885] [22-1433] [Entered: 07/28/2022 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE, to Appellee United States of America , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3355668] [22-1433] [Entered: 07/28/2022 08:19 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER, dated 07/25/2022, dismissing appeal by 08/15/2022, unless Appellant Gabriel Acosta, submits form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3353095] [22-1433] [Entered: 07/25/2022 07:30 AM]
|
| Filing 6 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[3345430] [22-1433] [Entered: 07/11/2022 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3345424] [22-1433] [Entered: 07/11/2022 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3345404] [22-1433] [Entered: 07/11/2022 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT Opinion and Order, dated 06/01/2022, RECEIVED.[3345400] [22-1433] [Entered: 07/11/2022 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Gabriel Acosta, FILED. [3345399] [22-1433] [Entered: 07/11/2022 11:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Acosta v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Gabriel Acosta | |
| Represented By: | Gabriel Acosta |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Varuni Nelson |
| Represented By: | Hiral Deepak Mehta |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
