United States of America v. Whittingham
United States of America |
Nadine Avia Whittingham |
22-1507 |
July 14, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
-Other Immigration Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Nadine Avia Whittingham Brief due date as 10/25/2022. Joint Appendix due date as 10/25/2022, FILED.[3363791] [22-1507] [Entered: 08/11/2022 01:41 PM] |
Filing 20 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Nadine Avia Whittingham, informing Court of proposed due date 10/25/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 08/10/2022 by CM/ECF.[3363160] [22-1507] [Entered: 08/10/2022 02:34 PM] |
Filing 18 NEW CASE MANAGER, Tynetta Wilder, ASSIGNED.[3356156] [22-1507] [Entered: 07/28/2022 03:45 PM] |
Filing 12 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Nadine Avia Whittingham, FILED. Service date 07/26/2022 by CM/ECF.[3354273] [22-1507] [Entered: 07/26/2022 10:59 AM] |
Filing 11 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Nadine Avia Whittingham, FILED. Service date 07/26/2022 by CM/ECF.[3354269] [22-1507] [Entered: 07/26/2022 10:58 AM] |
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Nadine Avia Whittingham, FILED. Service date 07/26/2022 by CM/ECF.[3354263] [22-1507] [Entered: 07/26/2022 10:56 AM] |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Layaliza Soloveichik for Appellee United States of America, in case 22-1507, [ # 8 ], ADDED.[3348850] [22-1507] [Entered: 07/15/2022 03:26 PM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 07/15/2022 by CM/ECF. [3348797] [22-1507] [Entered: 07/15/2022 02:34 PM] |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 07/15/2022 by CM/ECF.[3348788] [22-1507] [Entered: 07/15/2022 02:25 PM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3347859] [22-1507] [Entered: 07/14/2022 12:59 PM] |
Filing 5 DISTRICT COURT AMENDED JUDGMENT, dated 07/13/2022, RECEIVED.[3347857] [22-1507] [Entered: 07/14/2022 12:58 PM] |
Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 06/28/2022, RECEIVED.[3347855] [22-1507] [Entered: 07/14/2022 12:57 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 06/24/2022, RECEIVED.[3347854] [22-1507] [Entered: 07/14/2022 12:56 PM] |
Filing 2 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Nadine Avia Whittingham, district court receipt # ANYEDC-15744898, FILED.[3347853] [22-1507] [Entered: 07/14/2022 12:55 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Nadine Avia Whittingham, FILED. [3347851] [22-1507] [Entered: 07/14/2022 12:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: United States of America v. Whittingham | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Varuni Nelson |
Represented By: | Layaliza Soloveichik Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Nadine Avia Whittingham | |
Represented By: | Pieter H.B. Van Tol III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.