United States of America v. Hill
| United States of America |
| Shawn Hill |
| 22-1536 |
| July 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3350368] [22-1536] [Entered: 07/19/2022 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 07/18/2022, RECEIVED.[3349706] [22-1536] [Entered: 07/18/2022 09:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Shawn Hill, FILED. [3349705] [22-1536] [Entered: 07/18/2022 09:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Hill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Sandra Slack Glover |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Shawn Hill | |
| Represented By: | John M. Andreini Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
