Johnson v. Richland County Jail
Robert W. Johnson |
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers, Susan Hughes, Jill Lewis, J. Steve Sheldon, James P. Sweat, Donald Zehner, Richland County Correctional Facility, Aramark Food Services, Inc., Richland County Community Alternative Center, Richland County Detention Center, Richland County Food Services, Securus Technologies, Inc., Securus Correctional Billing Services, State of Ohio and Drew Nelson |
22-1572 |
July 18, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE, to Respondent Securus Technologies, Inc., regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT.[3352775] [22-1572] [Entered: 07/22/2022 02:43 PM] |
Filing 7 NOTICE, to Respondent Securus Correctional Billing Services, regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT.[3352769] [22-1572] [Entered: 07/22/2022 02:37 PM] |
Filing 3 ORDER, dated 07/21/2022, dismissing appeal by 08/11/2022, unless Petitioner Robert W. Johnson, submits a motion for leave to file, copy to petitioner, FILED.[3352046] [22-1572] [Entered: 07/21/2022 03:41 PM] |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3352797] [22-1572] [Entered: 07/22/2022 02:56 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 05/31/2022, RECEIVED.[3352043] [22-1572] [Entered: 07/21/2022 03:39 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, and district court docket, on behalf of Petitioner Robert W. Johnson, RECEIVED.[3352039] [22-1572] [Entered: 07/21/2022 03:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.