Rivera v. United States of America
| Jesus Rivera |
| United States of America |
| 22-1685 |
| August 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Sentence (2255) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER, dated 09/30/2022, dismissing appeal by 10/21/2022, unless Appellant Jesus Rivera, moves for certificate of appealability, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3391298] [22-1685] [Entered: 09/30/2022 10:05 AM]
|
| Filing 18 ATTORNEY, Michael Douglas Maimin for United States of America, in case 22-1685, [ # 17 ], ADDED.[3387498] [22-1685] [Entered: 09/23/2022 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States of America in 22-1685, FILED. Service date 09/23/2022 by US mail. [3387484] [22-1685, 21-1260] [Entered: 09/23/2022 11:28 AM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER, dated 09/06/2022, stating this appeal may be subject to dismissal by 09/27/2022, unless Appellant Jesus Rivera, moves for certificate of appealability, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3376675] [22-1685] [Entered: 09/06/2022 10:36 AM]
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE, to Appellee United States of America, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3373741] [22-1685] [Entered: 08/30/2022 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION ORDER, denying motion to consolidate appeals as unnecessary, [ # 3367040-2 ], [ # 10 ], filed by Appellant Jesus Rivera in 21,1260, 22-1685, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [3367357][14] [21-1260, 22-1685] [Entered: 08/18/2022 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Jesus Rivera, FILED. Service date 08/09/2022 by US mail.[3367045] [22-1685] [Entered: 08/17/2022 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION, to consolidate appeals, on behalf of Appellant Jesus Rivera, FILED. Service date 08/09/2022 by US mail.[3367044] [22-1685] [Entered: 08/17/2022 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3359627] [22-1685] [Entered: 08/03/2022 07:57 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3359626] [22-1685] [Entered: 08/03/2022 07:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTE: See lead case, 21-1260, containing complete set of docket entries.[3359625] [22-1685] [Entered: 08/03/2022 07:55 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 07/08/2022, RECEIVED.[3359624] [22-1685] [Entered: 08/03/2022 07:54 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jesus Rivera in 22-1685, FILED. [3359623] [22-1685, 21-1260] [Entered: 08/03/2022 07:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rivera v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Jesus Rivera | |
| Represented By: | Jesus Rivera |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Won S. Shin |
| Represented By: | Michael Douglas Maimin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
