United States of America v. Applins (Robinson)
| Billy J. Applins, AKA Gee, AKA Billy Pringle, James Kelly, AKA Boom, Nathan Speights, AKA The Mole, Dennis Jones, AKA Denny Man, AKA Crazy D, AKA JJ, Ismail Pierce, AKA Bird, AKA Rocket, AKA Holiday, AKA Styles, AKA Streets, Jerrawn Thomas, AKA Piper, AKA Jerrod, Ronnie Parnell, AKA Slick, Joseph Derby, AKA Bird, AKA Dirt, Charmish Singletary, AKA Meechie, AKA Sly, Lonnie Singletary, AKA LA, Gregory Griffin, AKA Meeshack, Andre Applins, AKA AJ, Tyler Willis, AKA Trouble T, Skyler Willis, AKA Sky and Gregory Thomas, AKA Little Earl, AKA E-Z |
| United States of America |
| William Robinson, AKA Gugu, AKA Googs, AKA Google |
| 22-1686 |
| August 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 08/04/2022 by CM/ECF.[3359929] [22-1686] [Entered: 08/04/2022 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3360240] [22-1686] [Entered: 08/04/2022 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3359640] [22-1686] [Entered: 08/03/2022 09:43 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, dated 07/15/2022, RECEIVED.[3359635] [22-1686] [Entered: 08/03/2022 09:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant William Robinson, FILED. [3359634] [22-1686] [Entered: 08/03/2022 09:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
